Scientific Blackpill: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 1,474: Line 1,474:
* Attractiveness (female raters only)
* Attractiveness (female raters only)


Inter-rater reliability was high for all four dimensions ([https://www.reddit.com/r/BlackPillScience/comments/8csgjw/looks_ratings_101_nearly_all_studies_show_a/ As measured by Cronbachs Alpha]). Thus it was demonstrated that raters could come to a clear consensus on how dominant, aggressive, facially fat, and attractive each man was.
Inter-rater reliability was high for all four dimensions ([https://www.reddit.com/r/BlackPillScience/comments/8csgjw/looks_ratings_101_nearly_all_studies_show_a/ As measured by Cronbachs Alpha]). Thus it was demonstrated that raters could come to a clear consensus on how dominant, aggressive, overweight, and attractive each man was.


Analysis of outcomes showed that men's fWHR explained fully 34% of the variance in women's interest in men for short-term relationships. fWHR was a very powerful predictor of being chosen for future dates by the women, even when a higher fWHR faces was not deemed more attractive. High fWHR men were perceived as more dominant and thus more desirable to women for short-term sexual involvement.
Analysis of outcomes showed that men's fWHR explained fully 34% of the variance in women's interest in men for short-term relationships. fWHR was a very powerful predictor of being chosen for future dates by the women, even when a higher fWHR faces was not deemed more attractive. High fWHR men were perceived as more dominant and thus more desirable to women for short-term sexual involvement.

Navigation menu