Trusted, Automoderated users
25,837
edits
Sexual Utopia in Power (book): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
Fix typographical error
No edit summary |
m (Fix typographical error) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
== Summary == | == Summary == | ||
It explores primarily the relationship between monogamy and natural female sexuality. | It explores primarily the relationship between monogamy and natural female sexuality. | ||
He explains how the rise in divorse and decline in monogamy is causing inceldom. He argues that the sexual revolution has false advertising surrounding it and generally increased | He explains how the rise in divorse and decline in monogamy is causing inceldom. He argues that the sexual revolution has false advertising surrounding it and generally increased sexlessness. He also believes that society is becoming hyper-primitive with the liberation of natural female sexuality. That natural female sexual liberation leads to a Darwinian mating competition more similar to a Baboon pack than any other civilized society. | ||
==Contents== | ==Contents== | ||
The short tract begins with Devlin | The short tract begins with Devlin elaborating his concept of female 'hypergamy' referring to evolutionary biology and [[Bateman's Principle]] as a guide to its mechanism of operation in human females. | ||
This leads into him criticizing what he calls "well meaning conservatives" i.e tradcons illusions concerning the sexual motivations of females as being essentially monogamous in nature, with Devlin arguing women are instead hypergamous, using James Bond as an example of a universally desirable mate to women, in other words what would later be called a [[Chad]] in the incelosphere. | This leads into him criticizing what he calls "well meaning conservatives" i.e tradcons illusions concerning the sexual motivations of females as being essentially monogamous in nature, with Devlin arguing women are instead hypergamous, using James Bond as an example of a universally desirable mate to women, in other words what would later be called a [[Chad]] in the incelosphere. | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
He then describes two sexual 'utopias' from which the title of the work derives: the male utopia of limitless sexual promiscuity and sexual access and the female utopia of obtaining the [[Gigachad|highest quality mate]] and implausibly securing commitment from him. He goes on to describe to ideal form this utopia takes in the female mind, using an example from the Ancient Greek reactionary and satirist Aristophanes's work, Ecclesiazusae, where the women of the city of Athens seize power in a coup and force the [[Gigachad|most handsome]] man in the city to have sex with all the women [[Femcel|starting with the least attractive.]] | He then describes two sexual 'utopias' from which the title of the work derives: the male utopia of limitless sexual promiscuity and sexual access and the female utopia of obtaining the [[Gigachad|highest quality mate]] and implausibly securing commitment from him. He goes on to describe to ideal form this utopia takes in the female mind, using an example from the Ancient Greek reactionary and satirist Aristophanes's work, Ecclesiazusae, where the women of the city of Athens seize power in a coup and force the [[Gigachad|most handsome]] man in the city to have sex with all the women [[Femcel|starting with the least attractive.]] | ||
He then goes on to criticise the feminist idea of sexual double standard regarding promiscuity, with it being supposedly socially valued in men and deplored in women. Devlin argues against this view claiming that in traditional societies | He then goes on to criticise the feminist idea of sexual double standard regarding promiscuity, with it being supposedly socially valued in men and deplored in women. Devlin argues against this view claiming that in traditional societies promiscuous men frequently fall under social and legal sanction, and in any case due to women being the 'choosers' of when a sexual encounter will occur, women are therefore ultimately to blame for being [[Short-term relationship|pumped and dumped.]] | ||
He then details the then incipient rise of 'rape hysteria' in the west, detailing what he describes as a trend of sexually inexperienced young men being accused of rape by their jilted lovers during college casual sexual encounters. He argues that there exists a double standard of women engaging in promiscuity and crying rape when they face the social and moral consequences of these acts, and that women should be held responsible for their own actions in this regard. | He then details the then incipient rise of 'rape hysteria' in the west, detailing what he describes as a trend of sexually inexperienced young men being accused of rape by their jilted lovers during college casual sexual encounters. He argues that there exists a double standard of women engaging in promiscuity and crying rape when they face the social and moral consequences of these acts, and that women should be held responsible for their own actions in this regard. | ||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
Anticipating the #me-too movement, and inverting a common feminist argument ( i.e the personal being political) , he argues this desire to [[White knight|protect women]] will lead to "a policeman in every bedroom" and sees it ultimately becoming a threat to the then status quo of political liberalism in western countries. | Anticipating the #me-too movement, and inverting a common feminist argument ( i.e the personal being political) , he argues this desire to [[White knight|protect women]] will lead to "a policeman in every bedroom" and sees it ultimately becoming a threat to the then status quo of political liberalism in western countries. | ||
He then goes on to criticise the concept of 'date rape' and what he considers the feminist re-definition and weaponisation against men of the concept of rape in general. He goes on to argue that this feminist hostility towards men leads to the | He then goes on to criticise the concept of 'date rape' and what he considers the feminist re-definition and weaponisation against men of the concept of rape in general. He goes on to argue that this feminist hostility towards men leads to the objectification of men and encourages women to take a callous and instrumental view of men. | ||
He argues this feminist definition of rape is increasingly leading to men becoming what the manosphere would call [[Redpill|redpilled]] about women's nature and avoiding long term engagements with women, seeking instead to pump-and dump. He then argues that what women consider [[Creepiness|sexual harrasment]] is merely women resisting traditional courtship behaviour from [[Creepiness|unattractive men.]] He ominously states that this hostility towards men will result in increased violence and victimization of women by men disabused of their chivalrous conditioning and the dissapation of men's natural tendency to [[White knight|protect women from violence.]] | He argues this feminist definition of rape is increasingly leading to men becoming what the manosphere would call [[Redpill|redpilled]] about women's nature and avoiding long term engagements with women, seeking instead to pump-and dump. He then argues that what women consider [[Creepiness|sexual harrasment]] is merely women resisting traditional courtship behaviour from [[Creepiness|unattractive men.]] He ominously states that this hostility towards men will result in increased violence and victimization of women by men disabused of their chivalrous conditioning and the dissapation of men's natural tendency to [[White knight|protect women from violence.]] | ||