Rape: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
1 byte added ,  24 July 2019
m
(Added a section explaining some of the research that finds much higher rates of conception from acts of rape vs consensual intercourse.)
Line 70: Line 70:


==Conception from rape==
==Conception from rape==
There exists some evidence <ref>https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2012/08/20/study-rape-victims-have-a-higher-pregnancy-rates-than-other-women/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.5918e1e478ea</ref> that women are more likely to conceive from rape intercourse then consensual intercourse. For obvious reasons, this is a very controversial subject to study (with Feminists employing the Naturalistic Fallacy to condemn such findings, (i.e if rape is 'natural' then it must be good, ergo researchers into these matters are encouraging rape), and the evidence for this assertion is mixed.
There exists some evidence <ref>https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2012/08/20/study-rape-victims-have-a-higher-pregnancy-rates-than-other-women/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.5918e1e478ea</ref> that women are more likely to conceive from rape intercourse then consensual intercourse. For obvious reasons, this is a very controversial subject to study (with Feminists employing the Naturalistic Fallacy to condemn such findings - i.e if rape is 'natural' then it must be good - ergo researchers into these matters are encouraging rape,) and the evidence for this assertion is mixed.


Gottschall& Gottschall using data from a national telephone survey of violence against women in the United States, found that there was a double (6.4% versus 3.1%) rate of conception from acts of rape vs consensual intercourse.
Gottschall& Gottschall using data from a national telephone survey of violence against women in the United States, found that there was a double (6.4% versus 3.1%) rate of conception from acts of rape vs consensual intercourse.

Navigation menu