Scientific Blackpill: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 2,521: Line 2,521:
----
----


A simulated civil case was performed using college students (N = 324) as mock jurors. The case involved a plaintiff accusing a defendant of workplace sexual harassment. The physical attractiveness of the litigants was manipulated, and mock jurors were asked to decide whether the defendant was guilty.


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15074507
They found that both the attractiveness of the plaintiff and defendant significantly affected outcomes of guilt or innocence. In particular:
 
* When the plaintiff was attractive, jurors were nearly twice as likely find in favor of the plaintiff, and they were more certain of the guilt of the defendant.
* When the defendant was unattractive, female jurors were up to four times more likely to render a guilty verdict.
 
<span style="font-size:125%>'''References:'''</span>
* ''When the defendant was unattractive, female jurors were significantly more likely to render a guilty verdict.''
* ''The present results suggest that the physical appearance of litigants can influence the judgment of jurors.''
 
<span style="font-size:125%>'''References:'''</span>
* https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15074507
* https://www.researchgate.net/publication/8626354_Effects_of_Physical_Attractiveness_on_Evaluations_of_a_Male_Employee's_Allegation_of_Sexual_Harassment_by_His_Female_Employer


===<span style="font-family:'Linux Libertine, Georgia, Times, serif'; font-size:24px; font-weight: normal;">Men & especially ugly men are considered inherently "creepier" than women</span>===
===<span style="font-family:'Linux Libertine, Georgia, Times, serif'; font-size:24px; font-weight: normal;">Men & especially ugly men are considered inherently "creepier" than women</span>===

Navigation menu