Trusted, Automoderated users
2,147
edits
Scientific Blackpill: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Photoshopping a photo of a man into a luxury apartment made women rate him as 30% more attractive
| Line 1,387: | Line 1,387: | ||
* https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10508-017-0968-7 | * https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10508-017-0968-7 | ||
===<span style="font-family:'Linux Libertine, Georgia, Times, serif'; font-size:24px; font-weight: normal;">Photoshopping | ===<span style="font-family:'Linux Libertine, Georgia, Times, serif'; font-size:24px; font-weight: normal;">Photoshopping a man into a luxury apartment made women rate him as 30% more attractive=== | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Dunn & Hill (2014) conducted a study wherein undergraduate students (females rating a males photo;n = 35) rated the attractiveness of a control photo of a opposite sex target in a 'neutral' apartment vs luxury. The photos were rated by two groups of participants, one group rating the control photo and another rating the luxury apartment photo. The participants rated the attractiveness of the opposite sex target photo on a decile (1-10) scale. | Dunn & Hill (2014) conducted a study wherein undergraduate students (females rating a males photo;n = 35) rated the attractiveness of a control photo of a opposite sex target in a 'neutral' apartment vs luxury. The photos were rated by two groups of participants, one group rating the control photo and another rating the luxury apartment photo. The participants rated the attractiveness of the opposite sex target photo on a decile (1-10) scale. | ||