6,480
edits
Scientific Blackpill: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
→Neurotypical peers are less willing to interact with those with autism, and see them as less attractive.
(Added 'Neurotypical peers are less willing to interact with those with autism, and see them as less attractive' to 'mental' section. More suifuel for aspies.) |
|||
| Line 372: | Line 372: | ||
===<span style="font-family:'Linux Libertine, Georgia, Times, serif'; font-size:24px; font-weight: normal;">Neurotypical peers are less willing to interact with those with autism, and see them as less attractive. </span>=== | ===<span style="font-family:'Linux Libertine, Georgia, Times, serif'; font-size:24px; font-weight: normal;">Neurotypical peers are less willing to interact with those with autism, and see them as less attractive. </span>=== | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Sasson et al. (2017) conducted a series of studies with a similar methodology consisting of groups of ASD (Autism Spectrum Disorder) and NT (Neurotypical) peers consisting of 'thin slices' | Sasson et al. (2017) conducted a series of studies with a similar methodology consisting of groups of ASD (Autism Spectrum Disorder) and NT (Neurotypical) peers in various modes of social interaction consisting of 'thin slices'. The study discussed here consisted of forty adult (20 ASD; 20 NT;17 males each group) participants. | ||
The participants were comparable in IQ as measured by the (Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale) and age. | The participants were comparable in IQ as measured by the (Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale) and age. The participants were made to record a 60 second mock audition for a fictional reality television program, which were edited into five presentation modalities: (1) audio-only (2) visual-only (3) audio-visual (4) static image and (5) transcript of speech content. | ||
This allowed the researchers to examine the effects of the which elements of the participants presentation styles contributed to the first impressions. | This allowed the researchers to examine the effects of the which elements of the participants presentation styles contributed to the first impressions of observers. | ||
The participants were then rated by a group of volunteers (who weren't informed of the clinical diagnoses of the ASD participants) in the form of an online survey. Each stimulus was rated one at a time on ten items using a four-point scale (0–3), on a number of socially desirable traits that are accurately assessed at first acquaintance: attractiveness, awkwardness, intelligence, likeability, trustworthiness, and dominance. | The participants were then rated by a group of volunteers (who weren't informed of the clinical diagnoses of the ASD participants) in the form of an online survey. Each stimulus was rated one at a time on ten items using a four-point scale (0–3), on a number of socially desirable traits that are accurately assessed at first acquaintance: attractiveness, awkwardness, intelligence, likeability, trustworthiness, and dominance. | ||