Trusted, Automoderated users
2,147
edits
Line 717: | Line 717: | ||
* Being bottom 10% facially costs $40,000 extra per year compared to an average man or $186,000 extra compared to a top 10% man. | * Being bottom 10% facially costs $40,000 extra per year compared to an average man or $186,000 extra compared to a top 10% man. | ||
* The maximum cost of facial ugliness in the percentile ranges they were able to measure was $186,000, for a bottom 10% man to match a top 10% man. | * The maximum cost of facial ugliness in the percentile ranges they were able to measure was $186,000, for a bottom 10% man to match a top 10% man. | ||
If these annual costs can be applied over the decades that a long term partnership would involve, one can conceive that the value of a man's race, height, and face to a woman can be estimated well into the millions of dollars over a lifetime. | If these annual costs can be applied over the decades that a long term partnership would involve, one can conceive that the value of a man's race, height, and face to a woman can be estimated well into the millions of dollars over a lifetime. |