Scientific Blackpill: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 789: Line 789:
The authors of the study also found that "(The data was) examined to see if any women in our samples showed a significant preference for weaker men. They did not. '''None of the 160 women in our study who rated attractiveness produced a statistically significant preference for weaker men''' (all p > 0.05) ... In other words, we could find no evidence that there exists a sizeable population of women who prefer physically weaker men when evaluating male bodies."
The authors of the study also found that "(The data was) examined to see if any women in our samples showed a significant preference for weaker men. They did not. '''None of the 160 women in our study who rated attractiveness produced a statistically significant preference for weaker men''' (all p > 0.05) ... In other words, we could find no evidence that there exists a sizeable population of women who prefer physically weaker men when evaluating male bodies."


Other findings of the two studies were:
<span style="font-size:125%>'''Quotes:'''</span>
<span style="font-size:125%></span>
* ''Ratings of strength are a robust and much larger predictor of bodily attractiveness than either height or weight.''
* ''Ratings of strength are a robust and much larger predictor of bodily attractiveness than either height or weight.''
* ''Height is attractive even independent of making a man look strong. Controlling for how strong a man actually looks, raters still classify taller men as more attractive in two of the three samples.''
* ''Height is attractive even independent of making a man look strong. Controlling for how strong a man actually looks, raters still classify taller men as more attractive in two of the three samples.''

Navigation menu