Scientific Blackpill: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 760: Line 760:


==''Body''==
==''Body''==
===<span style="font-family:'Linux Libertine, Georgia, Times, serif'; font-size:24px; font-weight: normal;">All women find the bodies of "strong looking men" more attractive then those with weaker bodies</span>===
----
Two studies by Sell,Lukazsweski and Townsley (2017) published by the Royal Society examining the preferences of 160 young female raters, found a very strong (r=0.80) correlation between bodily attractiveness and rated physical strength. Furthermore, they discovered "we found no evidence of the inverted-U hypothesis(i.e that there is a level of musculature/physicality that 'too much' to be attractive); rather, in both samples, the strongest men were the most attractive, and the weakest men were the least attractive".
The authors of the study also found that "(The data was) examined to see if any women in our samples showed a significant preference for weaker men. They did not. '''None of the 160 women in our study who rated attractiveness produced a statistically significant preference for weaker men''' (all p > 0.05) ... In other words, we could find no evidence that there exists a sizeable population of women who prefer physically weaker men when evaluating male bodies."
Other findings of the two studies were:
<span style="font-size:125%></span>
* ''Ratings of strength are a robust and much larger predictor of bodily attractiveness than either height or weight.''
* ''Height is attractive even independent of making a man look strong. Controlling for how strong a man actually looks, raters still classify taller men as more attractive in two of the three samples.''
* ''Weight is unattractive after controlling for how strong a man looks...this is consistent with the hypothesis that women's mate choice mechanisms respond to muscle mass positively but large stores of body fat negatively.''
* ''Height, weight and ratings of strength collectively account for approximately 80% of the variance in male bodily attractiveness.''
* ''Cues of upper body strength account for most of the variance in men's bodily attractiveness.''
* ''Contrary to popular theories of men's physical attractiveness, there was no evidence of a nonlinear effect; the strongest men were the most attractive in all samples.''
<span style="font-size:125%>'''References:'''</span>
* https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full/10.1098/rspb.2017.1819#d3e552
* https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29237852


===<span style="font-family:'Linux Libertine, Georgia, Times, serif'; font-size:24px; font-weight: normal;">36.4% of US male online daters are now resorting to anabolic steroids & bulimia to compete</span>===
===<span style="font-family:'Linux Libertine, Georgia, Times, serif'; font-size:24px; font-weight: normal;">36.4% of US male online daters are now resorting to anabolic steroids & bulimia to compete</span>===
Line 802: Line 783:
<span style="font-size:125%>'''References:'''</span>
<span style="font-size:125%>'''References:'''</span>
* https://jeatdisord.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40337-019-0244-4#Sec10
* https://jeatdisord.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40337-019-0244-4#Sec10
===<span style="font-family:'Linux Libertine, Georgia, Times, serif'; font-size:24px; font-weight: normal;">All women find the bodies of "strong looking men" more attractive then those with weaker bodies</span>===
----
Two studies by Sell,Lukazsweski and Townsley (2017) published by the Royal Society examining the preferences of 160 young female raters, found a very strong (r=0.80) correlation between bodily attractiveness and rated physical strength. Furthermore, they discovered "we found no evidence of the inverted-U hypothesis(i.e that there is a level of musculature/physicality that 'too much' to be attractive); rather, in both samples, the strongest men were the most attractive, and the weakest men were the least attractive".
The authors of the study also found that "(The data was) examined to see if any women in our samples showed a significant preference for weaker men. They did not. '''None of the 160 women in our study who rated attractiveness produced a statistically significant preference for weaker men''' (all p > 0.05) ... In other words, we could find no evidence that there exists a sizeable population of women who prefer physically weaker men when evaluating male bodies."
Other findings of the two studies were:
<span style="font-size:125%></span>
* ''Ratings of strength are a robust and much larger predictor of bodily attractiveness than either height or weight.''
* ''Height is attractive even independent of making a man look strong. Controlling for how strong a man actually looks, raters still classify taller men as more attractive in two of the three samples.''
* ''Weight is unattractive after controlling for how strong a man looks...this is consistent with the hypothesis that women's mate choice mechanisms respond to muscle mass positively but large stores of body fat negatively.''
* ''Height, weight and ratings of strength collectively account for approximately 80% of the variance in male bodily attractiveness.''
* ''Cues of upper body strength account for most of the variance in men's bodily attractiveness.''
* ''Contrary to popular theories of men's physical attractiveness, there was no evidence of a nonlinear effect; the strongest men were the most attractive in all samples.''
<span style="font-size:125%>'''References:'''</span>
* https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full/10.1098/rspb.2017.1819#d3e552
* https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29237852


===<span style="font-family:'Linux Libertine, Georgia, Times, serif'; font-size:24px; font-weight: normal;">Facial attractiveness contributes more to overall attractiveness then body, particularly in men </span>===
===<span style="font-family:'Linux Libertine, Georgia, Times, serif'; font-size:24px; font-weight: normal;">Facial attractiveness contributes more to overall attractiveness then body, particularly in men </span>===

Navigation menu