Trusted, Automoderated users
2,147
edits
Scientific Blackpill: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Women have a general preference for larger penises
| Line 490: | Line 490: | ||
A study by Prause ''et al.'' examined the preference for penis size in their male partners among women. It found that presented with scale 3D printed dildos, women preferred a penis of slightly larger circumference and length for one-time (length = 6.4 inches/16.3 cm, circumference = 5.0 inches/12.7 cm) versus long-term (length = 6.3 inches/16.0 cm, circumference = 4.8 inches/12.2 cm) sexual partners. Which according to [https://calcsd.netlify.com/full this website] demonstrates women preferred a penis fully one standard deviation above the average penis size for one-night stands. | A study by Prause ''et al.'' examined the preference for penis size in their male partners among women. It found that presented with scale 3D printed dildos, women preferred a penis of slightly larger circumference and length for one-time (length = 6.4 inches/16.3 cm, circumference = 5.0 inches/12.7 cm) versus long-term (length = 6.3 inches/16.0 cm, circumference = 4.8 inches/12.2 cm) sexual partners. Which according to [https://calcsd.netlify.com/full this website] demonstrates women preferred a penis fully one standard deviation above the average penis size for one-night stands. | ||
21% of the | 21% of the study's participants also admitted they had terminated a relationship due to the partner's penis being 'too small' vs 7% ending a relationship due to the partner's penis being 'too big'. | ||
<span style="font-size:125%>'''References:'''</span> | |||
* https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0133079 | |||
* https://calcsd.netlify.com/full | |||
===<span style="font-family:'Linux Libertine, Georgia, Times, serif'; font-size:24px; font-weight: normal;">Larger penis has an equivalent effect to greater height on male attractiveness to women</span>=== | |||
---- | |||
A further study by Mautz ''et al.'' published (comically enough) in PNAS (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2013) where women rated life sized projections of 3D male bodies, which varied on such dimensions as shoulder to waist width ratio, stature and flaccid penis length, concluded (in somewhat contradiction to the results of the above study, which examined preferences for erect and not flaccid penis length) that "surprisingly, larger penis size and greater height had almost equivalent positive effects on male attractiveness" and that size of flaccid penis that was seen as more attractive by women, didn't decrease at the upper range examined (at least up to the limit of 13 cm, or 5.11 inches used in the study) along with greater height similarly always being more attractive. | A further study by Mautz ''et al.'' published (comically enough) in PNAS (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2013) where women rated life sized projections of 3D male bodies, which varied on such dimensions as shoulder to waist width ratio, stature and flaccid penis length, concluded (in somewhat contradiction to the results of the above study, which examined preferences for erect and not flaccid penis length) that "surprisingly, larger penis size and greater height had almost equivalent positive effects on male attractiveness" and that size of flaccid penis that was seen as more attractive by women, didn't decrease at the upper range examined (at least up to the limit of 13 cm, or 5.11 inches used in the study) along with greater height similarly always being more attractive. | ||
| Line 497: | Line 504: | ||
<span style="font-size:125%>'''References:'''</span> | <span style="font-size:125%>'''References:'''</span> | ||
* https://www.pnas.org/content/110/17/6925 | * https://www.pnas.org/content/110/17/6925 | ||
==''Age''== | ==''Age''== | ||