6,480
edits
Scientific Blackpill: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
(Added a section on the framepill.) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 369: | Line 369: | ||
===<span style="font-family:'Linux Libertine, Georgia, Times, serif'; font-size:24px; font-weight: normal;">All women view the bodies of "strong looking men" as more attractive then those with weaker bodies</span>=== | ===<span style="font-family:'Linux Libertine, Georgia, Times, serif'; font-size:24px; font-weight: normal;">All women view the bodies of "strong looking men" as more attractive then those with weaker bodies</span>=== | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Two studies by Sell,Lukazsweski and Townsley (2017) examining the preferences of 100 young female raters, found a very strong (r=0.80) correlation between bodily attractiveness and rated physical strength. Furthermore, they discovered "we found no evidence of the inverted-U hypothesis(i.e that there is a level of musculature/physicality that 'too much' to be attractive); rather, in both samples, the strongest men were the most attractive, and the weakest men were the least attractive". | Two studies by Sell,Lukazsweski and Townsley (2017) published by the Royal Society examining the preferences of 100 young female raters, found a very strong (r=0.80) correlation between bodily attractiveness and rated physical strength. Furthermore, they discovered "we found no evidence of the inverted-U hypothesis(i.e that there is a level of musculature/physicality that 'too much' to be attractive); rather, in both samples, the strongest men were the most attractive, and the weakest men were the least attractive". | ||
The authors of the study also found that "(The data was) examined to see if any women in our samples showed a significant preference for weaker men. They did not. None of the 160 women in our study who rated attractiveness produced a statistically significant preference for weaker men (all p > 0.05) ... In other words, we could find no evidence that there exists a sizeable population of women who prefer physically weaker men when evaluating male bodies." | The authors of the study also found that "(The data was) examined to see if any women in our samples showed a significant preference for weaker men. They did not. None of the 160 women in our study who rated attractiveness produced a statistically significant preference for weaker men (all p > 0.05) ... In other words, we could find no evidence that there exists a sizeable population of women who prefer physically weaker men when evaluating male bodies." | ||
| Line 379: | Line 379: | ||
* ''Weight is unattractive after controlling for how strong a man looks...this is consistent with the hypothesis that women's mate choice mechanisms respond to muscle mass positively but large stores of body fat negatively.'' | * ''Weight is unattractive after controlling for how strong a man looks...this is consistent with the hypothesis that women's mate choice mechanisms respond to muscle mass positively but large stores of body fat negatively.'' | ||
* ''Height, weight and ratings of strength collectively account for approximately 80% of the variance in male bodily attractiveness.'' | * ''Height, weight and ratings of strength collectively account for approximately 80% of the variance in male bodily attractiveness.'' | ||
<span style="font-size:125%>'''References:'''</span> | |||
* https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full/10.1098/rspb.2017.1819#d3e552 | |||
==''Dick''== | ==''Dick''== | ||