Purplepill: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
corrected typo
No edit summary |
(corrected typo) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
The purplepill is the stance of being neutral or on the fence with regards to gender relations or state of the [[dating]] scene; i.e. not on the [[manosphere]] or [[redpilled]] side, nor on the feminist, [[bluepilled]] or banal side. Purplepillers are for the most part non-ideological. | The purplepill is the stance of being neutral or on the fence with regards to gender relations or state of the [[dating]] scene; i.e. not on the [[manosphere]] or [[redpilled]] side, nor on the feminist, [[bluepilled]] or banal side. Purplepillers are for the most part non-ideological. | ||
The term "purplepill" was coined because the color purple is an intermediate between the colors blue and red, and as such allowed for a space pertaining to nuanced discussion rather the echo chambers that can sometimes be prevalent in redpilled or bluepilled platforms. An example of a purpose-built forum created for this purpose is the PurplePillDebate subreddit wherein red pillers, blue pillers and | The term "purplepill" was coined because the color purple is an intermediate between the colors blue and red, and as such allowed for a space pertaining to nuanced discussion rather the echo chambers that can sometimes be prevalent in redpilled or bluepilled platforms. An example of a purpose-built forum created for this purpose is the PurplePillDebate subreddit wherein red pillers, blue pillers and purplepillers debate one another. | ||
Being purplepilled is essentially the default position, on pretty much any issue. That's because it is a neutral position. As an analogy, on the quantitative spectrum of politics, the equivalent outlook would be "centrism". | Being purplepilled is essentially the default position, on pretty much any issue. That's because it is a neutral position. As an analogy, on the quantitative spectrum of politics, the equivalent outlook would be "centrism". | ||