Scientific Blackpill: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Scientific Blackpill (edit)

Revision as of 23:37, 23 June 2019

2 bytes added ,  23 June 2019
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 120: Line 120:
* Stephen, I.D., Law Smith, M.J., Stirrat, M.R. et al. Facial Skin Coloration Affects Perceived Health of Human Faces. Int J Primatol (2009) 30: 845. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10764-009-9380-z
* Stephen, I.D., Law Smith, M.J., Stirrat, M.R. et al. Facial Skin Coloration Affects Perceived Health of Human Faces. Int J Primatol (2009) 30: 845. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10764-009-9380-z
* https://www.livescience.com/5860-attractiveness-based-partly-skin-color.html
* https://www.livescience.com/5860-attractiveness-based-partly-skin-color.html
==[Hypergamy] The top 5-20% of men are having more sex than ever ==
Data was drawn from the 2002 and 2011–2013 National Survey of Family Growth, a US household survey focusing on sexual and reproductive health.
Researchers found that compared to 2002, men overall had the same number of partners in 2013. However, the top 20% of men had a 25% increase in sexual partners. The top 5% of men had an outstanding 38% increase in the number of sexual partners.
Thus while the amount of male sex that was had was unchanged, more of the sex was consolidated into extra sex for the top 5-20% of men (ie. "Chads"). Thus it is clear that Chads are truly having more sex than ever before.
<span style="font-size:125%>'''Quotes:'''</span>
* ''Although we found no change in median numbers of sex partners [for men], we found significant increases in the numbers of sex partners reported by the top 5% and 20%.''
* ''We found an overall statistically significant increase in reported lifetime opposite-sex sex partners overall for men in the top 20% from 12 in 2002 to 15 in 2011–2013 (95% CIs, 11–14 and 15–15, respectively).''
* ''Similarly, there was a statistically significant overall increase in reported lifetime partners for men in the top 5% from 38 in 2002 to 50 in 2011–2013 (95% CIs, 30–40 and 50–50, respectively).''
<span style="font-size:125%>'''References:'''</span>
* Harper CR, Dittus PJ, Leichliter JS, Aral, SO. Changes in the Distribution of Sex Partners in the United States: 2002 to 2011–2013. Sexually Transmitted Diseases: February 2017 - Volume 44 - Issue 2 - p 96–100. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000554
* https://journals.lww.com/stdjournal/Fulltext/2017/02000/Changes_in_the_Distribution_of_Sex_Partners_in_the.5.aspx


==[Age] It is normal for healthy men to find pubescent & prepubescent females sexually arousing==
==[Age] It is normal for healthy men to find pubescent & prepubescent females sexually arousing==
Line 173: Line 156:
==[Trends] Male celibacy is rising dramatically for men, especially for ethnic men ==
==[Trends] Male celibacy is rising dramatically for men, especially for ethnic men ==
All NORC GSS stats and figures.
All NORC GSS stats and figures.
==[Hypergamy] The top 10% of men get 58% of women's likes in online dating ==
Online dating app Hinge works similarly to Tinder, but was designed with the intent of creating a more equitable and better functioning dating market. However, even on Hinge, evidence for female hypergamy is overwhelming. The distribution of likes women provide is heavily skewed such that 16.4% of their likes go to the top 1% of men, 41.1% of their likes go to the top 5% of men, 58% of their likes go to the top 10%, and 95.7% of their likes go to the top 50%. This means that only 4.3% of their likes go to the entire bottom 50% of men. Thus a top 1% man will receive 190x times more likes as a man who is in the bottom 50%.
This suggests that women easily reach a very strong consensus on which men are attractive, which detracts from the notion that "beauty is subjective." It also suggests that if you are a below average man, the odds of receiving any significant number of likes at all or success is quite small.
The inequity in the dating market for each gender was further analyzed, and it was found that if the dating markets were considered like financial markets, the dating market for women would resemble Western Europe, while for men, it would resemble "kleptocracy, apartheid, perpetual civil war."
<span style="font-size:125%">'''Quotes:'''</span>
* ''The biggest problem men face on dating apps [is that] the Brad Pitts of the world take the lion’s share of the likes from an already like-deficient sex.''?
* ''Every nation in the world has a currency, but that currency is not equally distributed amongst the citizens of every country. These economic inequalities are described using what is called the Gini index. In our context, the closer the Gini index is to 0, the more equally likes are distributed across all of our users; a higher Gini index rating means more likes are being concentrated into fewer recipients.''
* ''It turns out that, as it pertains to incoming likes, straight females on Hinge show a Gini index of 0.376, and for straight males it’s 0.542. On a list of 149 countries’ Gini indices provided by the CIA World Factbook, this would place the female dating economy as 75th most unequal (average — think Western Europe) and the male dating economy as the 8th most unequal (kleptocracy, apartheid, perpetual civil war — think South Africa).''
<span style="font-size:125%">'''Figures:'''</span>
[[File:Hinge_likes_distribution_numbers.PNG]]
[[File:Distribution-of-Women-s-Likes-of-Men-on-Dating-App-Hinge.png]]
<span style="font-size:125%">'''References:'''</span>
* https://hingeirl.com/hinge-reports/whats-the-biggest-challenge-men-face-on-dating-apps-a-qa-with-aviv-goldgeier-junior-growth-engineer/
* https://qz.com/1051462/these-statistics-show-why-its-so-hard-to-be-an-average-man-on-dating-apps/
==[Culture] Online dating is now the primary way people meet for relationships==
According to data from the How Couples Meet and Stay Together survey, a comprehensive national survey on romantic [[relationship]]s in the US, 39% of couples now meet and start [[relationship]]s from online services. This has now become the leading way for [[relationship]]s to start. The share of couples meeting online has almost doubled since 2009. Between 1995 to 2017, meeting through friends saw the largest decline, with 40% fewer people meeting this way.
This is likely the most transformative change that has occurred in the dating sphere in the past 20 years. This change coincides clearly with many of the other trends discussed on this page, such as the overall increase in male celibacy during this time frame and greater amount of sex being consolidated to the top 5-20% of men.
This change has also created a $4 billion online dating industry. Many of these online services primarily target men for payments by requiring ongoing payments in order for their profile to be seen by women (eg. Tinder Boosts).
<span style="font-size:125%>'''Quotes:'''</span>
* ''For heterosexual couples in the U.S., meeting online has become the most popular way couples meet, eclipsing meeting through friends for the first time around 2013.''
* ''39% of heterosexual couples that got together in the US in 2017 met online.''
* ''The share of couples meeting online has just about doubled since 2009.''
* ''Between 1995 to 2017, meeting through friends saw the largest decline, from 33% of couples at the start of the period to just 20% at the end.''
* ''We find that Internet meeting is displacing the roles that family and friends once played in bringing couples together.''
<span style="font-size:125%>'''References:'''</span>
* Rosenfeld M, Thomas RJ, Hausen S. 2019. Research Note:  Disintermediating your friends. Pending for peer-review publication.
* https://web.stanford.edu/~mrosenfe/Rosenfeld_et_al_Disintermediating_Friends.pdf
* https://data.stanford.edu/hcmst
* https://qz.com/1546677/around-40-of-us-couples-now-first-meet-online/


==[Looks] Beauty is objective and measurable in the brain ==
==[Looks] Beauty is objective and measurable in the brain ==
Line 283: Line 222:


[[Category:Theories]][[Category:Blackpill]]
[[Category:Theories]][[Category:Blackpill]]
==[Hypergamy] Online dating is now the primary way people meet for relationships==
According to data from the How Couples Meet and Stay Together survey, a comprehensive national survey on romantic [[relationship]]s in the US, 39% of couples now meet and start [[relationship]]s from online services. This has now become the leading way for [[relationship]]s to start. The share of couples meeting online has almost doubled since 2009. Between 1995 to 2017, meeting through friends saw the largest decline, with 40% fewer people meeting this way.
This is likely the most transformative change that has occurred in the dating sphere in the past 20 years. This change coincides clearly with many of the other trends discussed on this page, such as the overall increase in male celibacy during this time frame and greater amount of sex being consolidated to the top 5-20% of men.
This change has also created a $4 billion online dating industry. Many of these online services primarily target men for payments by requiring ongoing payments in order for their profile to be seen by women (eg. Tinder Boosts).
<span style="font-size:125%>'''Quotes:'''</span>
* ''For heterosexual couples in the U.S., meeting online has become the most popular way couples meet, eclipsing meeting through friends for the first time around 2013.''
* ''39% of heterosexual couples that got together in the US in 2017 met online.''
* ''The share of couples meeting online has just about doubled since 2009.''
* ''Between 1995 to 2017, meeting through friends saw the largest decline, from 33% of couples at the start of the period to just 20% at the end.''
* ''We find that Internet meeting is displacing the roles that family and friends once played in bringing couples together.''
<span style="font-size:125%>'''References:'''</span>
* Rosenfeld M, Thomas RJ, Hausen S. 2019. Research Note:  Disintermediating your friends. Pending for peer-review publication.
* https://web.stanford.edu/~mrosenfe/Rosenfeld_et_al_Disintermediating_Friends.pdf
* https://data.stanford.edu/hcmst
* https://qz.com/1546677/around-40-of-us-couples-now-first-meet-online/
==[Hypergamy] The top 10% of men get 58% of women's likes in online dating ==
Online dating app Hinge works similarly to Tinder, but was designed with the intent of creating a more equitable and better functioning dating market. However, even on Hinge, evidence for female hypergamy is overwhelming. The distribution of likes women provide is heavily skewed such that 16.4% of their likes go to the top 1% of men, 41.1% of their likes go to the top 5% of men, 58% of their likes go to the top 10%, and 95.7% of their likes go to the top 50%. This means that only 4.3% of their likes go to the entire bottom 50% of men. Thus a top 1% man will receive 190x times more likes as a man who is in the bottom 50%.
This suggests that women easily reach a very strong consensus on which men are attractive, which detracts from the notion that "beauty is subjective." It also suggests that if you are a below average man, the odds of receiving any significant number of likes at all or success is quite small.
The inequity in the dating market for each gender was further analyzed, and it was found that if the dating markets were considered like financial markets, the dating market for women would resemble Western Europe, while for men, it would resemble "kleptocracy, apartheid, perpetual civil war."
<span style="font-size:125%">'''Quotes:'''</span>
* ''The biggest problem men face on dating apps [is that] the Brad Pitts of the world take the lion’s share of the likes from an already like-deficient sex.''?
* ''Every nation in the world has a currency, but that currency is not equally distributed amongst the citizens of every country. These economic inequalities are described using what is called the Gini index. In our context, the closer the Gini index is to 0, the more equally likes are distributed across all of our users; a higher Gini index rating means more likes are being concentrated into fewer recipients.''
* ''It turns out that, as it pertains to incoming likes, straight females on Hinge show a Gini index of 0.376, and for straight males it’s 0.542. On a list of 149 countries’ Gini indices provided by the CIA World Factbook, this would place the female dating economy as 75th most unequal (average — think Western Europe) and the male dating economy as the 8th most unequal (kleptocracy, apartheid, perpetual civil war — think South Africa).''
<span style="font-size:125%">'''Figures:'''</span>
[[File:Hinge_likes_distribution_numbers.PNG]]
[[File:Distribution-of-Women-s-Likes-of-Men-on-Dating-App-Hinge.png]]
<span style="font-size:125%">'''References:'''</span>
* https://hingeirl.com/hinge-reports/whats-the-biggest-challenge-men-face-on-dating-apps-a-qa-with-aviv-goldgeier-junior-growth-engineer/
* https://qz.com/1051462/these-statistics-show-why-its-so-hard-to-be-an-average-man-on-dating-apps/
==[Hypergamy] The top 5-20% of men are having more sex than ever ==
Data was drawn from the 2002 and 2011–2013 National Survey of Family Growth, a US household survey focusing on sexual and reproductive health.
Researchers found that compared to 2002, men overall had the same number of partners in 2013. However, the top 20% of men had a 25% increase in sexual partners. The top 5% of men had an outstanding 38% increase in the number of sexual partners.
Thus while the amount of male sex that was had was unchanged, more of the sex was consolidated into extra sex for the top 5-20% of men (ie. "Chads"). Thus it is clear that Chads are truly having more sex than ever before.
<span style="font-size:125%>'''Quotes:'''</span>
* ''Although we found no change in median numbers of sex partners [for men], we found significant increases in the numbers of sex partners reported by the top 5% and 20%.''
* ''We found an overall statistically significant increase in reported lifetime opposite-sex sex partners overall for men in the top 20% from 12 in 2002 to 15 in 2011–2013 (95% CIs, 11–14 and 15–15, respectively).''
* ''Similarly, there was a statistically significant overall increase in reported lifetime partners for men in the top 5% from 38 in 2002 to 50 in 2011–2013 (95% CIs, 30–40 and 50–50, respectively).''
<span style="font-size:125%>'''References:'''</span>
* Harper CR, Dittus PJ, Leichliter JS, Aral, SO. Changes in the Distribution of Sex Partners in the United States: 2002 to 2011–2013. Sexually Transmitted Diseases: February 2017 - Volume 44 - Issue 2 - p 96–100. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000554
* https://journals.lww.com/stdjournal/Fulltext/2017/02000/Changes_in_the_Distribution_of_Sex_Partners_in_the.5.aspx
Retrieved from "https://incels.wiki/w/Special:MobileDiff/17487"

Navigation menu