6,480
edits
Sexual Utopia in Power (book): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Proofreading.
No edit summary |
(Proofreading.) |
||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
In the final part of the work, he outlines what he sees as the solutions to the problems he has described, preceding the intellectual [[Jordan Peterson|Jordan Peterson's]] argument for 'enforced monogamy'. He claims that men have the upper hand in the relations between the sexes stating that only [[Normie|men who still play by the old rules]] are holding men back from settling accounts with women. He calls for the government to get out of enforcing the marriage contract, instead calling for a libertarian-style direct marriage contract between spouses. He states this will no longer force men to be [[Cuckoldry|Cuckolded]] and cheated out of their wealth by their unfaithful spouses. | In the final part of the work, he outlines what he sees as the solutions to the problems he has described, preceding the intellectual [[Jordan Peterson|Jordan Peterson's]] argument for 'enforced monogamy'. He claims that men have the upper hand in the relations between the sexes stating that only [[Normie|men who still play by the old rules]] are holding men back from settling accounts with women. He calls for the government to get out of enforcing the marriage contract, instead calling for a libertarian-style direct marriage contract between spouses. He states this will no longer force men to be [[Cuckoldry|Cuckolded]] and cheated out of their wealth by their unfaithful spouses. | ||
He argues that women who complain of 'date rape' should be forced to hold a shotgun marriage with their purported rapists, arguing they will be too busy rearing children to quibble about feminist notions of consent. He calls for women that make false harrasment accusations to be publicly added to a register to be 'named and shamed' saying this will make them act in a more circumspect manner. He then calls for an end to co-ed schools, arguing that they encourage promiscuity in women, distraction from their studies in men, and that men will be more likely to marry if inexperience [[Bluepill| | He argues that women who complain of 'date rape' should be forced to hold a shotgun marriage with their purported rapists, arguing they will be too busy rearing children to quibble about feminist notions of consent. He calls for women that make false harrasment accusations to be publicly added to a register to be 'named and shamed' saying this will make them act in a more circumspect manner. He then calls for an end to co-ed schools, arguing that they encourage promiscuity in women, distraction from their studies in men, and that men will be more likely to marry if due to inexperience they will likely have [[Bluepill|a naive view of female nature.]] | ||
Finally, he makes a spirited argument for enforced monogamy, appealing to natural law and what he sees as mens superiority over women as demonstrating that monogamy is more to womens and societies benefit then mens, and justifying the imposition of it on women by men. He echoes the anthropologist J.D Unwin in claiming that monogamy is a requisite for a stable, strong society and claiming that the west will be conquered by a culture that still enforces it if it fails to restore it. | Finally, he makes a spirited argument for enforced monogamy, appealing to natural law and what he sees as mens superiority over women as demonstrating that monogamy is more to womens and societies benefit then mens, and justifying the imposition of it on women by men. He echoes the anthropologist J.D Unwin in claiming that monogamy is a requisite for a stable, strong society and claiming that the west will be conquered by a culture that still enforces it if it fails to restore it. | ||