6,480
edits
Sexual Utopia in Power (book): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
(Added long description of contents.) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
The short tract begins with Devlin elabourating his concept of female 'hypergamy' referring to evolutionary biology and [[Bateman's Principle]] as a guide to its mechanism of operation in human females. | The short tract begins with Devlin elabourating his concept of female 'hypergamy' referring to evolutionary biology and [[Bateman's Principle]] as a guide to its mechanism of operation in human females. | ||
This leads into him criticizing what he calls "well meaning conservatives" i.e tradcons illusions concerning the sexual motivations of females as being essentially monogamous in nature, with Devlin arguing women are instead | This leads into him criticizing what he calls "well meaning conservatives" i.e tradcons illusions concerning the sexual motivations of females as being essentially monogamous in nature, with Devlin arguing women are instead hypergamous, using James Bond as an example of a universally desirable mate to women, in other words what would later be called a [[Chad]] in the incelosphere. | ||
He then describes two sexual 'utopias' from which the title of the work derives: the male utopia of limitless sexual promiscuity and sexual access and the female utopia of obtaining the [[Gigachad|highest quality mate]] and implausibly securing commitment from him. | He then describes two sexual 'utopias' from which the title of the work derives: the male utopia of limitless sexual promiscuity and sexual access and the female utopia of obtaining the [[Gigachad|highest quality mate]] and implausibly securing commitment from him. He goes on to describe to ideal form this utopia takes in the female mind, using an example from the Ancient Greek reactionary and satirist Aristophanes's work, Ecclesiazusae, where the women of the city of Athens seize power in a coup and force the [[Gigachad|most handsome]] man in the city to have sex with all the women [[Femcel|starting with the least attractive.]] | ||
He then goes on to criticise the feminist idea of sexual double standard regarding promiscuity, with it being supposedly socially valued in men and deplored in women. Devlin argues against this view claiming that in traditional societies promiscious men frequently fall under social and legal sanction, and in any case due to women being the 'choosers' of when a sexual encounter will occur, women are therefore ultimately to blame for being [[Short-term relationship|pumped and dumped.]] | |||
He then goes on to criticise the feminist idea of sexual double standard regarding promiscuity, with it being supposedly socially valued in men and deplored in women. | |||
Devlin argues against this view claiming that in traditional societies promiscious men frequently fall under social and legal sanction, and in any case due to women being the 'choosers' of when a sexual encounter will occur, women are therefore ultimately to blame for being [[Short-term relationship|pumped and dumped.]] | |||
He then details the then incipient rise of 'rape hysteria' in the west, detailing what he describes as a trend of sexually inexperienced young men being accused of rape by their jilted lovers during college casual sexual encounters. He argues that there exists a double standard of women engaging in promiscuity and crying rape when they face the social and moral consequences of these acts, and that women should be held responsible for their own actions in this regard. | He then details the then incipient rise of 'rape hysteria' in the west, detailing what he describes as a trend of sexually inexperienced young men being accused of rape by their jilted lovers during college casual sexual encounters. He argues that there exists a double standard of women engaging in promiscuity and crying rape when they face the social and moral consequences of these acts, and that women should be held responsible for their own actions in this regard. | ||
| Line 23: | Line 19: | ||
Anticipating the #me-too movement, and inverting a common feminist argument ( i.e the personal being political) , he argues this desire to [[White knight|protect women]] will lead to "a policeman in every bedroom" and sees it ultimately becoming a threat to the then status quo of political liberalism in western countries. | Anticipating the #me-too movement, and inverting a common feminist argument ( i.e the personal being political) , he argues this desire to [[White knight|protect women]] will lead to "a policeman in every bedroom" and sees it ultimately becoming a threat to the then status quo of political liberalism in western countries. | ||
He then goes on to criticise the concept of 'date rape' and what he considers the feminist re-definition and weaponisation against men of the concept of rape in general. | He then goes on to criticise the concept of 'date rape' and what he considers the feminist re-definition and weaponisation against men of the concept of rape in general. He goes on to argue that this feminist hostility towards men leads to the objecification of men and encourages women to take a callous and instrumental view of men. | ||
He goes on to argue that this feminist hostility towards men leads to the objecification of men and encourages women to take a callous and instrumental view of men. | |||
He argues this feminist definition of rape is increasingly leading to men becoming what the manosphere would call [[Redpill|Redpilled]] about women's nature and avoiding long term engagements with women, seeking instead to pump-and dump. He then argues that what women consider [[Creepiness|sexual harrasment]] is merely women resisting traditional courtship behaviour from [[Creepiness|unattractive men.]] He ominously states that this hostility towards men will result in increased violence and victimization of women by men disabused of their chivalrous conditioning and the dissapation of men's natural tendency to [[White knight|protect women from violence.]] | He argues this feminist definition of rape is increasingly leading to men becoming what the manosphere would call [[Redpill|Redpilled]] about women's nature and avoiding long term engagements with women, seeking instead to pump-and dump. He then argues that what women consider [[Creepiness|sexual harrasment]] is merely women resisting traditional courtship behaviour from [[Creepiness|unattractive men.]] He ominously states that this hostility towards men will result in increased violence and victimization of women by men disabused of their chivalrous conditioning and the dissapation of men's natural tendency to [[White knight|protect women from violence.]] | ||
He then goes on the argue that the sexual revolution has failed in its touted goal of ending sexual frustration by promoting 'free love'. | He then goes on the argue that the sexual revolution has failed in its touted goal of ending sexual frustration by promoting 'free love'. He points out due to the natural human birth ratio producing more male offspring then female and women's natural tendency towards [[hypergamy]], that allowing women unimpeded sexual license will lead to the sexual dynamics of the great apes becoming apparent in human society, with the '[[Chad|top men']] monopolizing the majority of women. He argues this results in a vicious spiral due to the female mammalian instinct of mate-choice copying ( pre-selection) resulting in the cementing of a polyandrous status quo. | ||
He points out due to the natural human birth ratio producing more male offspring then female and women's natural tendency towards [[hypergamy]], that allowing women unimpeded sexual license will lead to the sexual dynamics of the great apes becoming apparent in human society, with the '[[Chad|top men']] monopolizing the majority of women. | |||
He argues this results in a vicious spiral due to the female mammalian instinct of mate-choice copying ( pre-selection) resulting in the cementing of a polyandrous status quo | |||
He argues that these women are merely [[Volceldom|Voluntarily Celibate]] women whose hypergamy is so out of control (due to the influence of the mass media expanding womens horizons in terms of thr attractiveness of men they are exposed to) that they see the vast majority of men as beneath them, until they hit [[The Wall]] and then are shocked and outraged when men who have adapted to the new sexual paradigm refuse to commit to them. | He then goes on to describe what he sees as an increasing phenomenon of female [[Femcel|spinsters]] who eschew sexual relations with men in their prime years of fertility. He argues that these women are merely [[Volceldom|Voluntarily Celibate]] women whose hypergamy is so out of control (due to the influence of the mass media expanding womens horizons in terms of thr attractiveness of men they are exposed to) that they see the vast majority of men as beneath them, until they hit [[The Wall]] and then are shocked and outraged when men who have adapted to the new sexual paradigm refuse to commit to them. | ||
He then details the ways in which he perceives that feminism has made many women un-marriageble; by making them hostile to the sexual advances of men and teaching them to view them in a defensive manner, by increasingly female promiscuity and encouraging un-feminine and uncouth behavior by them. He observed that if women had behaved in this manner throughout all history, the human race would hence be extinct. | He then details the ways in which he perceives that feminism has made many women un-marriageble; by making them hostile to the sexual advances of men and teaching them to view them in a defensive manner, by increasingly female promiscuity and encouraging un-feminine and uncouth behavior by them. He observed that if women had behaved in this manner throughout all history, the human race would hence be extinct. | ||
| Line 49: | Line 37: | ||
Revealing his white nationalist beliefs, he deplores the effects this climate of hostility and disturbed relations between the sexes, and the declining marriage rate in the west will have on the white race, alluding to the [[Just be white|trend of white men seeking foreign brides instead of their own women.]] | Revealing his white nationalist beliefs, he deplores the effects this climate of hostility and disturbed relations between the sexes, and the declining marriage rate in the west will have on the white race, alluding to the [[Just be white|trend of white men seeking foreign brides instead of their own women.]] | ||
In the final part of the work, he outlines what he sees as the solutions to the problems he has described, preceding the intellectual [[Jordan Peterson|Jordan Peterson's]] | In the final part of the work, he outlines what he sees as the solutions to the problems he has described, preceding the intellectual [[Jordan Peterson|Jordan Peterson's]] argument for 'enforced monogamy'. He claims that men have the upper hand in the relations between the sexes stating that only [[Normie|men who still play by the old rules]] are holding men back from settling accounts with women. He calls for the government to get out of enforcing the marriage contract, instead calling for a libertarian-style direct marriage contract between spouses. He states this will no longer force men to be [[Cuckoldry|Cuckolded]] and cheated out of their wealth by their unfaithful spouses. | ||
He claims that men have the upper hand in the relations between the sexes stating that only [[Normie|men who still play by the old rules]] are holding men back from settling accounts with women. He calls for the government to get out of enforcing the marriage contract, instead calling for a libertarian-style direct marriage contract between spouses. He states this will no longer force men to be [[Cuckoldry|Cuckolded]] and cheated out of their wealth by their unfaithful spouses. | |||
He argues that women who complain of 'date rape' should be forced to hold a shotgun marriage with their purported rapists, arguing they will be too busy rearing children to quibble about feminist notions of consent. He calls for women that make false harrasment accusations to be publicly added to a register to be 'named and shamed' saying this will make them act in a more circumspect manner. He then calls for an end to co-ed schools, arguing that they encourage promiscuity in women, distraction from their studies in men, and that men will be more likely to marry if inexperience [[Bluepill|will be more likely to have a naive view of female nature.]] | |||
He echoes the anthropologist J.D Unwin in claiming that monogamy is a requisite for a stable, strong society and claiming that the west will be conquered by a culture that still enforces it if it fails to restore it. | Finally, he makes a spirited argument for enforced monogamy, appealing to natural law and what he sees as mens superiority over women as demonstrating that monogamy is more to womens and societies benefit then mens, and justifying the imposition of it on women by men. He echoes the anthropologist J.D Unwin in claiming that monogamy is a requisite for a stable, strong society and claiming that the west will be conquered by a culture that still enforces it if it fails to restore it. | ||
Popularity | Popularity | ||