Trusted, Automoderated users
25,837
edits
No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
One interesting development in the [[incelosphere]] in the late 2010s has been the rise of '''biological essentialism''' or '''gender essentialism'''. The claim that natural sexual instincts can't be overriden or are too hard to be overriden and therefore activism to change the way most people naturally sexually behave on a timescale shorter than thousands of years of human evolution is a waste of time. '''Biological essentialism''' is basically what many original [[blackpill]]ers promote and as such they fatalism as incelospherians generally evaluate female nature as negative. | One interesting development in the [[incelosphere]] in the late 2010s has been the rise of '''biological essentialism''' or '''gender essentialism'''. The claim that natural sexual instincts can't be overriden or are too hard to be overriden and therefore activism to change the way most people naturally sexually behave on a timescale shorter than thousands of years of human evolution is a waste of time. '''Biological essentialism''' is basically what many original [[blackpill]]ers promote and as such they promote fatalism as incelospherians generally evaluate female nature as negative. | ||
The same people who promote this worldview also generally claim any attempt at social engineering a change in people natural sexuality, like [[hypergamy|female hypergamy]] or the sexual barter system, would require a totalitarian state. So often proponents of biological or gender essentialism have a [[libertarian]] streak. | The same people who promote this worldview also generally claim any attempt at social engineering a change in people natural sexuality, like [[hypergamy|female hypergamy]] or the sexual barter system, would require a totalitarian state. So often proponents of biological or gender essentialism have a [[libertarian]] streak. |