Talk:Solution hypothesis

Possible Reason: People are not tactical at all

https://archive.fo/Iz5D9 - Fake: The enemy drumming up a bad image (False Opposition effect) - Gay: Homosexuality in denial, extending to Bipolar/BPD/Schizophrenia tendencies of unwarranted Aggression and Mania - Cringe: Overselling the idea without understanding Dominance https://archive.fo/H6w05 https://archive.fo/wkwO6 https://archive.fo/I9b1M - Retarded: Lack of strategic planning, political Masochism https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iz1Yb20kVug

https://archive.fo/KLUtl -- previous unsigned comment by 2001:67c:2628:647:12::65 > Hitler didn’t have any heirs to give his job to, of course, because Hitler was gay^H^H^H married to his country.

You are certainly free to add any of these hypotheses to the article, if your additions follow the wiki rules. Ultimately, this point is sort of tautological, I don't see incels leading a beta-uprising any time soon. Such men's role in the great scheme of things is likely to be pawns on the grand chessboard. (the men that have the will to power tend to get the women before or after they attain it).
>"Hitler didn’t have any heirs to give his job to, of course, because Hitler was gay^H^H^H married to his country."
Well the idea that he was an ascetic philosopher king married to his nation was pretty much a propaganda invention in my view. He lived pretty high on the taxpayer dime, directly or indirectly. As to the second point, I tend to defer to the general historical consensus that he was heterosexual, though likely psychosexually disturbed, perhaps due to being involuntarily celibate as a youth. Altmark22 (talk) 13:51, 12 July 2021 (UTC)