6,480
edits
Determinism: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
no edit summary
m (CBT could be compatible with determinism, external cause) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Soft determinists attempt to reconcile determinism with free-will.<ref>https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/compatibilism/</ref> Criticisms of the concept include the claim that the compatibilists conception of 'free will' are often so close to determinism as to be the same thing in all practical sense. These critics argue the ability to determine outcomes is more important than the ability to choose, but not affect outcomes. | Soft determinists attempt to reconcile determinism with free-will.<ref>https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/compatibilism/</ref> Criticisms of the concept include the claim that the compatibilists conception of 'free will' are often so close to determinism as to be the same thing in all practical sense. These critics argue the ability to determine outcomes is more important than the ability to choose, but not affect outcomes. | ||
Hard determinists do not believe in free will, and consider the concept illogical. Hard Determinism is at odds with political and social movements that place a strong emphasis on personal responsibility, including [[neoliberalism]] and associated movements. | Hard determinists do not believe in free will, and consider the concept illogical. Hard Determinism is at odds with political and social movements that place a strong emphasis on personal responsibility, including [[neoliberalism]] and associated movements. On the other hands, adherents of these movements often criticize determinism, largely in view of its potential social ramifications, such as lack of agency and responsibility, claims it inevitable leads to fatalism, and so on. | ||
==Hard determinism - not a fringe theory== | ==Hard determinism - not a fringe theory== | ||