6,480
edits
Simp: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
→Madonna-Whore Complex
mNo edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
Recently, [[OnlyFans]] (a website that monetizes simping) has been on the rise, and most bluepilled<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KUu9n6ASoEE</ref><ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CzwOZhdU5yw</ref><ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7G0FMVnzhyw</ref> channels are are focusing on "unearned intimacy". [[Milkmired]] women within the [[R/femaledatingstrategy|FDS]] community<ref>https://www.reddit.com/r/FemaleDatingStrategy/comments/jo7m61/the_madonnawhore_complex_in_men/</ref> characterize this behavior as an example of the Madonna-Whore Complex<ref>https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Madonna%E2%80%93whore_complex</ref>, where women are either [[Tradwife|submissive housewives]] or they are [[Whore|whores]] (women used solely for sexual gratification). | Recently, [[OnlyFans]] (a website that monetizes simping) has been on the rise, and most bluepilled<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KUu9n6ASoEE</ref><ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CzwOZhdU5yw</ref><ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7G0FMVnzhyw</ref> channels are are focusing on "unearned intimacy". [[Milkmired]] women within the [[R/femaledatingstrategy|FDS]] community<ref>https://www.reddit.com/r/FemaleDatingStrategy/comments/jo7m61/the_madonnawhore_complex_in_men/</ref> characterize this behavior as an example of the Madonna-Whore Complex<ref>https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Madonna%E2%80%93whore_complex</ref>, where women are either [[Tradwife|submissive housewives]] or they are [[Whore|whores]] (women used solely for sexual gratification). | ||
Hence, feminists blame "[[Patriarchy]]" as the main cause of simping, and not 'gynocracy' as many in the [[manosphere]] claim, due to patriarchy often promoting benevolent sexist behavior (BS) ([[chivalry]] and traditional gender roles). There is stronger correlation between the Madonna-whore complex and benevolent sexism, as opposed to hostile sexism [[Chad|an 'alpha' trait]]). And feminists have argued this complex produces negative outcomes for men as well as women, as men with this complex are more likely to be dissatisfied with their relationships, an effect which is not found among women.<ref>https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0361684319843298</ref> However, evidence suggests this higher relational dissatisfaction is entirely mediated by HS, as BS rather strongly promotes greater relationship satisfaction among men, while hostile sexism is associated with greater levels of conflict in men's relationships and lower relationship satisfaction.<ref>https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/2167696820934687</ref> | Hence, feminists blame "[[Patriarchy]]" as the main cause of simping, and not 'gynocracy' as many in the [[manosphere]] claim, due to patriarchy often promoting or co-existing with benevolent sexist behavior (BS) ([[chivalry]] and adherence to traditional gender roles during courtship). There is stronger correlation between the Madonna-whore complex and benevolent sexism, as opposed to hostile sexism (a proposed [[Chad|an 'alpha' trait]]). And feminists have argued this complex produces negative outcomes for men as well as women, as men with this complex are more likely to be dissatisfied with their relationships, an effect which is not found among women.<ref>https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0361684319843298</ref> However, evidence suggests this higher relational dissatisfaction is entirely mediated by HS, as BS rather strongly promotes greater relationship satisfaction among men, while hostile sexism is associated with greater levels of conflict in men's relationships and lower relationship satisfaction.<ref>https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/2167696820934687</ref> | ||
Opponents of feminists argue that women without this type of complex are more likely to be weaker in social dominance orientation (SDO), i.e. they are more likely to be disloyal to their superiors and their in-group in favor of out-groups. They become neither caretakers ([[Life history theory|K-selected behavior]]) nor sexual providers (r-selected behavior), and thus are more likely to be a [[feminist]] with an [[empowerment]] complex. (See: [[Sexual revolution]]) These anti-feminists argue treating women as individuals is not necessarily a virtue, as [[female hypoagency]] and [[affirmative action]] in the workplace can be used to gaslight a man into social shunning and submission. Thus, anti-feminists and traditionalists more broadly tend to claim this complex promotes healthy and adaptive behavior on behalf of individuals of both sexes. | Opponents of feminists argue that women without this type of complex are more likely to be weaker in social dominance orientation (SDO), i.e. they are more likely to be disloyal to their superiors and their in-group in favor of out-groups. They become neither caretakers ([[Life history theory|K-selected behavior]]) nor sexual providers (r-selected behavior), and thus are more likely to be a [[feminist]] with an [[empowerment]] complex. (See: [[Sexual revolution]]) These anti-feminists argue treating women as individuals is not necessarily a virtue, as [[female hypoagency]] and [[affirmative action]] in the workplace can be used to gaslight a man into social shunning and submission. Thus, anti-feminists and traditionalists more broadly tend to claim this complex promotes healthy and adaptive behavior on behalf of individuals of both sexes. | ||