6,480
edits
Simp: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
no edit summary
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Individuals in the [[manosphere]], and men more broadly, often believe simping spoils women by increasing their [[courtship]] expectations, increasing the amount of investment that is required from a man before a woman provides him with sexual access. Thus, simp shaming can be seen as a male version of the [[pussy cartel]], where women generally seek financial and emotional investment from men in exchange for sex, and men seek to counter this tendency by shaming other men who are seen to overinvest by providing investment with less-strings attached than other men, thereby collectively lowering men's bargaining power on the sexual marketplace. | Individuals in the [[manosphere]], and men more broadly, often believe simping spoils women by increasing their [[courtship]] expectations, increasing the amount of investment that is required from a man before a woman provides him with sexual access. Thus, simp shaming can be seen as a male version of the [[pussy cartel]], where women generally seek financial and emotional investment from men in exchange for sex, and men seek to counter this tendency by shaming other men who are seen to overinvest by providing investment with less-strings attached than other men, thereby collectively lowering men's bargaining power on the sexual marketplace. | ||
Other men argue that simping reaffirms women's [[female solipsism|solipsism]] and entitlement, and thus promotes socially aversive and exploitative behavior on behalf of women. Other men argue that simping is simply ineffective; either because women prefer being treated like shit by [[assholes]] or because any relationships that result from simping, being transactional in nature, will be unsatisfying (for the man) and fundamentally exploitative in nature. However, there is some evidence that certain behaviors/attitudes associated with less-pathetic manifestations of simping, such as benevolent sexism (chivalrous attitudes and behavior towards women), are both generally seen as desirable by women and are associated with better relationship outcomes for men who hold these attitudes.<ref>https://theconversation.com/why-women-including-feminists-are-still-attracted-to-benevolently-sexist-men-101067</ref><ref>https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/2167696820934687</ref> Some men also perceive simps as being weak and effeminate due to their agreeable nature, and therefore a fitting target for bullying. | Other men argue that simping reaffirms women's [[female solipsism|solipsism]] and entitlement, and thus promotes socially aversive and exploitative behavior on behalf of women. Other men argue that simping is simply ineffective; either because women prefer being treated like shit by [[assholes]] or because any relationships that result from simping, being transactional in nature, and not grounded in attraction, will be unsatisfying (for the man) and fundamentally exploitative in nature. However, there is some evidence that certain behaviors/attitudes associated with less-pathetic manifestations of simping, such as benevolent sexism (chivalrous attitudes and behavior towards women), are both generally seen as desirable by women and are associated with better relationship outcomes for men who hold these attitudes.<ref>https://theconversation.com/why-women-including-feminists-are-still-attracted-to-benevolently-sexist-men-101067</ref><ref>https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/2167696820934687</ref> Some men also perceive simps as being weak and effeminate due to their agreeable nature, and therefore a fitting target for bullying. | ||
The [[Betabuxx]] and the simp overlap in investment, the [[cuck]] and the simp overlap in pleasing the female at the expense of the man's dignity. | The [[Betabuxx]] and the simp overlap in investment, the [[cuck]] and the simp overlap in pleasing the female at the expense of the man's dignity. | ||