6,480
edits
Simp: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
→Does simping pay?
m (→Simps are happier: move) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
[[Betabuxx]] and simp overlap in investment, [[cuck]] and simp overlap in pleasing the female. | [[Betabuxx]] and simp overlap in investment, [[cuck]] and simp overlap in pleasing the female. | ||
== Does simping pay? == | == Does simping pay? == | ||
Theoretically, simping should not be | Theoretically, simping should not be seen in a pejorative light, as being nice to [[women]] should be accepted, since at face value being [[altruistic]] and [[empathetic]] are seen as positive virtues. Altruism and having empathy fall in line with the central creed of all the major religions, which is one that encourages following the Golden Rule; do unto others as you would wish upon yourself. However, women have brought it upon themselves that being nice to them is now seen as lowly. Take the term [[nice guy]] for instance; a [[bluepill]]ed outlook would suggest that a [[nice guy]] procures all the benefits of being an upstanding member of society. However many individuals in the manosphere and society more broadly argue these agreeable, chivalrous males often fail at procreation, due to women's inherent [[scelerophilia]] and [[hybristophilia]], which manifests itself in women at different levels of intensity. Thus they argue that simping generally doesn't payoff for men. | ||
On the other hand, research indicates that men who believe in simping have a ''higher'' subjective wellbeing.<ref>https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2011-16716-005</ref> | |||
This suggests the pathologization of simping in the [[manosphere]] is primarily a response to the perverse exaggeration of the [[women-are-wonderful effect]] in modern times, combined with the rise male [[sexual frustration]] spoiling the females, rather than simping (or investing into the female) being unnatural or harmful in itself. Since women have been dependent on men's resources throughout human history,<ref>https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill_(Supplemental)#Women_were_historically_predominantly_involved_in_cooking_and_they_never_dominated_men</ref> it should be expected that men also have evolved to derive pleasure from investing into the female as ensuring the survival of the mother and enabling her parental investment is heavily conductive to men's [[reproductive success]], especially among [[life history|k-strategists]]. | |||
==Madonna-Whore Complex == | ==Madonna-Whore Complex == | ||