Chad: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
87 bytes added ,  21 February 2022
Fixed typos, added some links
(incorrect spelling of pussywetter)
(Fixed typos, added some links)
Line 25: Line 25:


Women naturally evaluate men's status and ability to provide resources by deferring sex and downplaying their sexual interest.
Women naturally evaluate men's status and ability to provide resources by deferring sex and downplaying their sexual interest.
It appears only exceptionally good looking and dominant Chads can skip this stage no matter how poorly they behave (though some would argue that many women are more attracted to men with bad personalities), as was proven in [[Chadfishing]] experiments.
It appears only exceptionally good looking and dominant Chads can skip this stage no matter how poorly they behave (though some would argue that many women are more attracted to men with [[Scelerophilia|bad personalities]]), as was proven in [[Chadfishing]] experiments.


This phenomenon may be explained by the [[sexy son hypothesis]], which states [[Fisherian runaway|runaway selected ornament]] such as [[Beauty|good looks]] and highly masculine behavior can trump all other characteristics due to the prospect of having one's offspring inherit their good looks and [[rape]]y personaly, leading to greater [[reproductive success]] (which is all that matters from the point of view of the selfish genes).
This phenomenon may be explained by the [[sexy son hypothesis]], which states [[Fisherian runaway|runaway selected ornament]] such as [[Beauty|good looks]] and highly masculine behavior can trump all other characteristics due to the prospect of having one's offspring inherit their good looks and [[rape]]y personality, leading to greater [[reproductive success]] (which is all that matters from the point of view of the selfish genes).


However, there is also evidence suggesting that [[beauty]] is also weakly correlated with the overall quality of the organism. Slight deviations from the average face may serve as an indicator of developmental instability. This developmental instability may be either due to the presence of pollutants and toxins disturbing development or as a result of a high mutational load as suggested by researchers who argue that physical attractiveness is [[good genes hypothesis|generally indicative of overall genetic quality]].
However, there is also evidence suggesting that [[beauty]] is also weakly correlated with the overall quality of the organism. Slight deviations from the average face may serve as an indicator of developmental instability. This developmental instability may be either due to the presence of pollutants and toxins disturbing development or as a result of a high mutational load as suggested by researchers who argue that physical attractiveness is [[good genes hypothesis|generally indicative of overall genetic quality]].
Line 35: Line 35:
Cross-culturally, there is little evidence that women prefer masculine faces exclusively, with men's facial masculinity seemingly mostly unrelated to their overall facial attractiveness,<ref>https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0225549</ref> though this appears to vary by ecological and mating context. Humans are substantially [[wikipedia:Self-domestication|self-domesticated]] and therefore [[neoteny|neotenous]] (meaning retaining youthful features) such that some facial neoteny is also attractive in men (see [[pretty boy]]). In contrast, Chad's muscular body is nearly universally attractive to women.<ref>https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#Rated_strength_is_the_main_predictor_of_men.27s_bodily_attractiveness._No_women_prefer_weak_men</ref> However, women's attraction to more muscular males likely falls within a [[goldilocks zone]], with extreme levels of muscularity (such as what can be achieved via steroid abuse) possibly being detrimental to men's sexual attractiveness, however, as it is completely abnormal.
Cross-culturally, there is little evidence that women prefer masculine faces exclusively, with men's facial masculinity seemingly mostly unrelated to their overall facial attractiveness,<ref>https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0225549</ref> though this appears to vary by ecological and mating context. Humans are substantially [[wikipedia:Self-domestication|self-domesticated]] and therefore [[neoteny|neotenous]] (meaning retaining youthful features) such that some facial neoteny is also attractive in men (see [[pretty boy]]). In contrast, Chad's muscular body is nearly universally attractive to women.<ref>https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#Rated_strength_is_the_main_predictor_of_men.27s_bodily_attractiveness._No_women_prefer_weak_men</ref> However, women's attraction to more muscular males likely falls within a [[goldilocks zone]], with extreme levels of muscularity (such as what can be achieved via steroid abuse) possibly being detrimental to men's sexual attractiveness, however, as it is completely abnormal.
===Sexual antagonism or intralocus sexual conflict===
===Sexual antagonism or intralocus sexual conflict===
It has been noted that high fitness fathers (Chads) whilst they do produce high fitness sons (Sexy Sons Hypothesis) tend to also produce low fitness daughters and vise versa for Stacy's. This is because of certain traits that are expressed in both sexes but the optimal expression for that trait is different for both sexes. The most notable example of this in humans are the hips. In females the hips are selected to be wider for child birth and in males they are selected to narrower for movement and hunting. The constant tug and pull (antagonism) of selective pressures to have narrow hips in men but wider hips in women ensures that the trait doesn't go to far in either direction and unless sex-limited/sex-specific expression for a trait is coded for by a new gene this sexual antagonism will continue.<ref>https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227510622_Intersexual_ontogenic_conflict?_sg=xJj1oz_d9_SyuuhUv-SFaxlPwbuaS699leCMkfn9DR3qKPdFLYlsf2dLNqYV0B7kC2cXGJd13ibKC7E</ref> The most popular example of this can be found in Asian/Oriental women. Asians in general exhibit higher levels of neoteny than other races; as a result Asian women are the most sought over demographic on dating sites, because of this there are an overabundance of Asian Stacys. Typically these Asian Stacys catch white fever and will mate and have children with White Men; because neoteny is not completely sex-specific in its expression we find that High Fitness Asian Stacys produce Lower Fitness Eurasian sons (the most notable example of this being Eliot Rodger) but will also produce High Fitness Eurasian Daughters. Thus it seems that any marriage between a European and an Asian will have the most reproductive success if they produce only daughters. The same can be said for extremely tall, thin hipped and broad shouldered men. These men will go on to have High Fitness sons that are also tall, thin hipped and broad shouldered but will produce low fitness daughters that are lower in fitness that are tall, thin hipped and broad shouldered.
It has been noted that high fitness fathers (Chads) whilst they do produce high fitness sons ([[Sexy Sons hypothesis|Sexy Sons Hypothesis]]) tend to also produce low fitness daughters and vise versa for [[Stacy|Stacy's]]. This is because of certain traits that are expressed in both sexes but the optimal expression for that trait is different for both sexes. The most notable example of this in humans are the hips. In females the hips are selected to be wider for child birth and in males they are selected to narrower for movement and hunting. The constant tug and pull (antagonism) of selective pressures to have narrow hips in men but wider hips in women ensures that the trait doesn't go to far in either direction and unless sex-limited/sex-specific expression for a trait is coded for by a new gene this sexual antagonism will continue.<ref>https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227510622_Intersexual_ontogenic_conflict?_sg=xJj1oz_d9_SyuuhUv-SFaxlPwbuaS699leCMkfn9DR3qKPdFLYlsf2dLNqYV0B7kC2cXGJd13ibKC7E</ref> The most popular example of this can be found in Asian/Oriental women. Asians in general exhibit higher levels of [[neoteny]] than other races; as a result Asian women are the most sought over demographic on dating sites, because of this there are an overabundance of Asian Stacys. Typically these Asian Stacys catch [[AFWM|white fever]] and will mate and have children with White Men; because neoteny is not completely sex-specific in its expression we find that High Fitness Asian Stacys produce [[Hapas|Lower Fitness Eurasian sons]] (the most notable example of this being [[Elliot Rodger]]) but will also produce High Fitness Eurasian Daughters. Thus it seems that any marriage between a European and an Asian will have the most [[reproductive success]] if they produce only daughters. The same can be said for extremely tall, thin hipped and broad shouldered men. These men will go on to have High Fitness sons that are also tall, thin hipped and broad shouldered but will produce low fitness daughters that are lower in fitness that are tall, thin hipped and broad shouldered.


Most of what we know in this area comes from experiments with fruit flies; these experiments suggests that many traits are still under strong opposing selection pressures and that this is beneficial because it maintains genetic variation and neutralize the indirect (Good Genes) benefits of sexual selection.<ref>https://www.researchgate.net/publication/5373689_Reproductive_Behaviour_Evolves_Rapidly_When_Intralocus_Sexual_Conflict_Is_Removed?_sg=OoB67X1UKGlV3wByqt1aW7biksqNb3M8MZMZc61QpwzLt1JMt3uQqsD6v2YxdjML4qPXCp9zQyIUOGY</ref><ref>https://www.researchgate.net/publication/12158381_Negative_correlation_for_adult_fitness_between_sexes_reveals_ontogenetic_conflict_in_Drosophila?_sg=FvBnytCjO2ykLnzgv2EUr6ImQLt-Uz1xh21iKSerYaby3UlsREK78hth44a6lNICzkbCz3EoT0nkuIs</ref><ref>https://www.researchgate.net/publication/42372675_The_Sexually_Antagonistic_Genes_of_Drosophila_melanogaster?_sg=zE11MxwHeLLaKYJwF9SQm-OLGQI715wywduPlYcePdPDUj_t1F1PZcYS3GowqgXXmVr9b8f63HpssUE</ref><ref>https://www.researchgate.net/publication/6593814_An_Evolutionary_Cost_of_Separate_Genders_Revealed_by_Male-Limited_Evolution</ref> However we do have more observations of Sexual Antagonism in Red Deer, whereby Chad Red Deer produce low fitness daughters.<ref>https://www.researchgate.net/publication/6239287_Sexually_antagonistic_genetic_variation_for_fitness_in_Red_Deer</ref>
Most of what we know in this area comes from experiments with fruit flies; these experiments suggests that many traits are still under strong opposing selection pressures and that this is beneficial because it maintains genetic variation and neutralize the indirect (Good Genes) benefits of sexual selection.<ref>https://www.researchgate.net/publication/5373689_Reproductive_Behaviour_Evolves_Rapidly_When_Intralocus_Sexual_Conflict_Is_Removed?_sg=OoB67X1UKGlV3wByqt1aW7biksqNb3M8MZMZc61QpwzLt1JMt3uQqsD6v2YxdjML4qPXCp9zQyIUOGY</ref><ref>https://www.researchgate.net/publication/12158381_Negative_correlation_for_adult_fitness_between_sexes_reveals_ontogenetic_conflict_in_Drosophila?_sg=FvBnytCjO2ykLnzgv2EUr6ImQLt-Uz1xh21iKSerYaby3UlsREK78hth44a6lNICzkbCz3EoT0nkuIs</ref><ref>https://www.researchgate.net/publication/42372675_The_Sexually_Antagonistic_Genes_of_Drosophila_melanogaster?_sg=zE11MxwHeLLaKYJwF9SQm-OLGQI715wywduPlYcePdPDUj_t1F1PZcYS3GowqgXXmVr9b8f63HpssUE</ref><ref>https://www.researchgate.net/publication/6593814_An_Evolutionary_Cost_of_Separate_Genders_Revealed_by_Male-Limited_Evolution</ref> However we do have more observations of Sexual Antagonism in Red Deer, whereby Chad Red Deer produce low fitness daughters.<ref>https://www.researchgate.net/publication/6239287_Sexually_antagonistic_genetic_variation_for_fitness_in_Red_Deer</ref>
Anonymous user

Navigation menu