Trusted, Automoderated users
398
edits
Sexual attractiveness: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
→Bluepill Sexual Subjectivism: small add-on wording
(Added a Bluepill section that attempts at establishing objective beauty standards) |
m (→Bluepill Sexual Subjectivism: small add-on wording) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Yet another quality is the leanness of the face, with 12% being the optimal [[bodyfat]] percentage.<ref>Rantala, M. J., Coetzee, V., Moore, F. R., Skrinda, I., Kecko, S., Krama, T., ... & Krams, I. (2013). Adiposity, compared with masculinity, serves as a more valid cue to immunocompetence in human mate choice. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 280(1751), 20122495.</ref> | Yet another quality is the leanness of the face, with 12% being the optimal [[bodyfat]] percentage.<ref>Rantala, M. J., Coetzee, V., Moore, F. R., Skrinda, I., Kecko, S., Krama, T., ... & Krams, I. (2013). Adiposity, compared with masculinity, serves as a more valid cue to immunocompetence in human mate choice. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 280(1751), 20122495.</ref> | ||
== Bluepill Sexual Subjectivism == | == Bluepill Sexual Subjectivism == | ||
Bluepilled people believed that there will always be girls that like different traits. This is based on Malcom Gladwell's presentation | Bluepilled people believed that there will always be girls that like different traits. This is based on Malcom Gladwell's presentation<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iIiAAhUeR6Y</ref> on choice, variety and "people not knowing what they want". OkCupid's Data<ref>https://archive.fo/VELwq</ref> demonstrated that this is only partially true, since for females, larger variance in beauty is correlated to more messages (but this can be correlated to [[Juggernaut law]] rather than beauty). | ||
LessWrong<ref>https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/X3jz5mriJeWi2uLdF/how-subjective-is-attractiveness</ref> has demonstrated that there are good measures of variance of attractiveness. However data is lacking in that department, and that sub-group clustering did not exist in their article. TBD | LessWrong<ref>https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/X3jz5mriJeWi2uLdF/how-subjective-is-attractiveness</ref> has demonstrated that there are good measures of variance of attractiveness. However data is lacking in that department, and that sub-group clustering did not exist in their article. TBD | ||
== Video example== | == Video example== | ||
{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O42AR4SVJCs|frame|}} | {{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O42AR4SVJCs|frame|}} | ||