Bluepill: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
169 bytes added ,  3 September 2021
copied from Bluepiller
(→‎See Also: bluepill navbox)
(copied from Bluepiller)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[File:Bluepill.png|thumb|right]]
[[File:Bluepill.png|thumb|right]]
The '''bluepill''' is [[pill jargon]] for unquestionably [[accepting|accepting]] what the [[normie]] [[fakestream media]], similar conventional sources, and associated [[platitude|platitudes]] (i.e. [[chadsplaining]]) have to say about the dating scene.
The '''bluepill''' is [[pill jargon]] for unquestionably [[accepting|accepting]] what the [[normie]] [[fakestream media]], similar conventional sources, and associated [[platitude|platitudes]] (i.e. [[chadsplaining]]) have to say about the dating scene. A '''bluepiller''' is someone who holds [[bluepill]] (i.e. [[fakestream]]) beliefs; bluepillers are also referred to the [[manosphere]] as "the unwoke".
It has developed to mean an inability to see nuance, a belief in the just-world fallacy, accompanied by [[virtue signaling]], being unenlightened to the unpleasant realities of the world—thereby maintaining the status quo and their argumentum ad populum proposition. It is the preference of believing in comforting or convenient tropes, especially when it concerns a person's world view, with emphasis on the pretense or opinion that goes contrary to the research suggesting physical attraction plays an utmost role in social or sexual situations.  
 
The bluepill has developed to mean an inability to see nuance, a belief in the just-world fallacy, accompanied by [[virtue signaling]], being unenlightened to the unpleasant realities of the world—thereby maintaining the ''status quo'' and their argumentum ad populum proposition. It is the preference of believing in comforting or convenient tropes, especially when it concerns a person's world view, with emphasis on the pretense or opinion that goes contrary to the research suggesting physical attraction plays an utmost role in social or sexual situations.  


Although the bluepill and redpill are opposites, they do not necessarily equate to opposite political/social positions. The divergence pertains to ''how'' one has reached those positions. However, being bluepilled is typically one's original belief system, i.e., the one you were brought up with. As such, bluepilled views in, let's say a liberal pocket of Western Europe, are not the same as bluepilled views in the deep south of the United States. In laymen's terms, being bluepilled means being unable to produce original thoughts and a mindset that favors rehashing established ideas that have already been relayed to said person.
Although the bluepill and redpill are opposites, they do not necessarily equate to opposite political/social positions. The divergence pertains to ''how'' one has reached those positions. However, being bluepilled is typically one's original belief system, i.e., the one you were brought up with. As such, bluepilled views in, let's say a liberal pocket of Western Europe, are not the same as bluepilled views in the deep south of the United States. In laymen's terms, being bluepilled means being unable to produce original thoughts and a mindset that favors rehashing established ideas that have already been relayed to said person.
5,366

edits

Navigation menu