History of the Love-shy Revolution: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 5: Line 5:
[[Uglycel]]s accused the more open love-shys of an "infantile disorder", citing their lack of reading [[Otto Weininger]] and their willingness to include [[femcel]]s.
[[Uglycel]]s accused the more open love-shys of an "infantile disorder", citing their lack of reading [[Otto Weininger]] and their willingness to include [[femcel]]s.
=== 2018–2019 ===
=== 2018–2019 ===
At the [[2nd Congress of the SDYD]] in August 2018, love-shys and [[uglycel]]s disagreed, first about which persons should be in the editorial committee of the newspaper ''[[Incel Wiki]]'' and then about the definition of an "incel" in the future forum statute.<ref> https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1904/jan/31a.htm</ref>
At the [[2nd Congress of the SDYD]] in August 2018, love-shys and [[uglycel]]s disagreed, first about which persons should be in the editorial committee of the newspaper ''Incel Wiki'' and then about the definition of an "incel" in the future forum statute.<ref> https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1904/jan/31a.htm</ref>
* Love-shys formulation required the incel to be afflicted with the condition of inceldom, with no overriding philosophy
* Love-shys formulation required the incel to be afflicted with the condition of inceldom, with no overriding philosophy
* Uglycels only stated that they should work under the guidance of a party organization such as [[incels.co]] and a philosophy such as the [[blackpill]].
* Uglycels only stated that they should work under the guidance of a party organization such as [[incels.co]] and a philosophy such as the [[blackpill]].
5,366

edits

Navigation menu