Trusted, Automoderated users
5,366
edits
Fisherian runaway: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Good genes
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
==Discussion== | ==Discussion== | ||
===Good genes=== | ===Good genes=== | ||
{{main_article|[[Good genes hypothesis]] and [[ | {{main_article|[[Good genes hypothesis]], and [[Signaling theory]]}} | ||
Good genes hypothesis or ''Zahavi's handicap principle'' claims exaggerated ornament is a costly and hence a reliable signal of other desirable traits. For example, a peacock with a very large tail would be easy prey (which is costly), and thus would most likely have other good traits that make up for this handicap (good genes). There is, however, mixed supporting scientific evidence, with a consistent, but very small link between looks and health, but mixed evidence about the link between health and [[reproductive success]], with people vastly overestimating the correlation between good looks and various positive attributes (halo effect).<ref>https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#Attractive_people_are_perceived_much_more_positively_than_they_really_are</ref> | Good genes hypothesis or ''Zahavi's handicap principle'' claims exaggerated ornament is a costly and hence a reliable signal of other desirable traits. For example, a peacock with a very large tail would be easy prey (which is costly), and thus would most likely have other good traits that make up for this handicap (good genes). There is, however, mixed supporting scientific evidence, with a consistent, but very small link between looks and health, but mixed evidence about the link between health and [[reproductive success]], with people vastly overestimating the correlation between good looks and various positive attributes (halo effect).<ref>https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#Attractive_people_are_perceived_much_more_positively_than_they_really_are</ref> | ||