6,353
edits
Talk:IQ: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
no edit summary
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
::: I have not much to say about this except that this is a rather drastic response to a medium-sized edit of an unfinished article that is not A-class, let alone categorized by quality at all. Unfinished articles benefit from reorganization and larger edits. I did not remove any information, I only removed some redundancies like the repetition on how IQ is related to various measures of success, as well as some redundant wording. [[User:Bibipi|Bibipi]] ([[User talk:Bibipi|talk]]) 15:26, 29 April 2021 (UTC) | ::: I have not much to say about this except that this is a rather drastic response to a medium-sized edit of an unfinished article that is not A-class, let alone categorized by quality at all. Unfinished articles benefit from reorganization and larger edits. I did not remove any information, I only removed some redundancies like the repetition on how IQ is related to various measures of success, as well as some redundant wording. [[User:Bibipi|Bibipi]] ([[User talk:Bibipi|talk]]) 15:26, 29 April 2021 (UTC) | ||
: Yeah, it's actually very good. I was just annoyed that you completely altered the lede while I was gone tbh. I think four paragraphs, (what wikipedia advises) is a good general guide to optimal lede length. And I think the article is worthy of being A-class classified. I'll unlock soon and you can change what you don't like. [[User:Altmark22|Altmark22]] ([[User talk:Altmark22|talk]]) 23:07, 11 May 2021 (UTC) | : Yeah, it's actually very good. I was just annoyed that you completely altered the lede while I was gone tbh. I think four paragraphs, (what wikipedia advises) is a good general guide to optimal lede length. And I think the article is worthy of being A-class classified. I'll unlock soon and you can change what you don't like. [[User:Altmark22|Altmark22]] ([[User talk:Altmark22|talk]]) 23:07, 11 May 2021 (UTC) | ||
==Dysgenics== | |||
Article needs a section on the Woodley effect and the evidence of substantial secular declines in intelligence to give a more balanced overview of this issue as compared to the coverage of this topic on certain other wikis. | |||