2,849
edits
Bluepill: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Negativities
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
Over the course of the 2000s, frequenters of the incelosphere began seeing two discordant views begin to develop that seemed somewhat analogous to the contrasting view of perspectives between redpillers and bluepillers in The Matrix. Thereby, the term bluepill began being used to signify a worldview that aligns with the just-world hypothesis, feminism, platitudes, the mainstream media, and cliche viewpoints. On the other hand, for many omega males, the redpill began to signify having abandoned or being "woke" from these beliefs, which in the androsphere had supplementary beliefs such as women being privileged in modern society began gaining a foothold. | Over the course of the 2000s, frequenters of the incelosphere began seeing two discordant views begin to develop that seemed somewhat analogous to the contrasting view of perspectives between redpillers and bluepillers in The Matrix. Thereby, the term bluepill began being used to signify a worldview that aligns with the just-world hypothesis, feminism, platitudes, the mainstream media, and cliche viewpoints. On the other hand, for many omega males, the redpill began to signify having abandoned or being "woke" from these beliefs, which in the androsphere had supplementary beliefs such as women being privileged in modern society began gaining a foothold. | ||
== | ==Economic systems== | ||
The dominant economic systems in place in the world today are somewhat designed to ensure a narrative that leans bluepill. With the capitalist system, the media is coerced to be engrossing. When coupled with the inevitable and inherent gutsy nature of mass printing, the natural human emotion of vacillation is forced to take a backseat. The contrasting economic system of communism and its effects on mass media probably doesn't fare much better. However, most studies on these economic systems focus on their effects on the nations GDP, and on socioeconomic status. Most books on socialism, capitalism and communism will be tagged with phrases such as "standard of living" or "HDI" which means "Human Development Index". Space devoted to the economic system's effect on media is usually negligible and certainly not comprehensive. Although in terms of nominal GDP, capitalism is arguably a better system for growth than communism, if there were a way to stifle growth-obsession in a graceful manner, then that system would arguably work best to stifle the bluepill-inducing modus operandi of the modern western MSM (mainstream media). | |||
There are byproducts to the tendency of being gullible enough to swallow the MSM message wholesale. These include taking on characteristics typically associated with the MSM, such as deliberate sensationalism, a peculiarity that forces the journalist to engage in broad-brushing and pigeonholing in a scrupulous revenue accumulation attempt aimed at their unsuspecting patronage. That's one of the reasons why bluepillers are much more prone to pigeonholing than the rest of the population - a direct spawn of MSM behaviour. This propensity for pigeonholing is what makes the bluepilled mentality so dangerous, and as such bluepillers may be recognizable by their susceptibility to broadbrushing, pigeonholing and voicing the argumentum ad populum fallacy. This otherizing behaviour can precipitate into various forms of mental illness, including [[mentalcel|mentalceldom]]. | There are byproducts to the tendency of being gullible enough to swallow the MSM message wholesale. These include taking on characteristics typically associated with the MSM, such as deliberate sensationalism, a peculiarity that forces the journalist to engage in broad-brushing and pigeonholing in a scrupulous revenue accumulation attempt aimed at their unsuspecting patronage. That's one of the reasons why bluepillers are much more prone to pigeonholing than the rest of the population - a direct spawn of MSM behaviour. This propensity for pigeonholing is what makes the bluepilled mentality so dangerous, and as such bluepillers may be recognizable by their susceptibility to broadbrushing, pigeonholing and voicing the argumentum ad populum fallacy. This otherizing behaviour can precipitate into various forms of mental illness, including [[mentalcel|mentalceldom]]. | ||