Whatever (novel): Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No change in size ,  13 September 2019
Line 4: Line 4:


==Sexual markets and Michel Clouscard==
==Sexual markets and Michel Clouscard==
The novel was likely (somewhat) influenced by the writings of the French Marxist Sociologist [[Michel Clouscard]], who at least explored similar ideas, but with a different train of thought.  Clouscard notably critiqued the sexual revolution as aiming to distract the working class from their economic poverty by promoting a range of romantic choice not within the reach of most of the working class.<ref> https://philitt.fr/2019/02/28/le-capitalisme-selon-houellebecq-une-lutte-perpetuelle-qui-ne-peut-jamais-avoir-de-fin-1-3/ In French.</ref>  Clouscard indirectly criticized feminism as transactional and consumerist.  Cloudcard described the sexual marketplace being entirely the domian of rich people, whereas Houellebecq's characters described the sexual marketplace as all-encompassing.  Feminism was simply another example of things being allowed, but not possible.  Clouscard argued that it has served to divide the working class against itself (by agitating women against men, through labeling all men as oppressive "Phallocrats") in what he has dubbed "The prostitution economy."<ref> http://www.marxisme.wikibis.com/michel_clouscard.php  In French.</ref>
The novel was likely (somewhat) influenced by the writings of the French Marxist Sociologist [[Michel Clouscard]], who at least explored similar ideas, but with a different train of thought.  Clouscard notably critiqued the sexual revolution as aiming to distract the working class from their economic poverty by promoting a range of romantic choice not within the reach of most of the working class.<ref> https://philitt.fr/2019/02/28/le-capitalisme-selon-houellebecq-une-lutte-perpetuelle-qui-ne-peut-jamais-avoir-de-fin-1-3/ In French.</ref>  Clouscard indirectly criticized feminism as consumerist and a distraction.  Cloudcard described the sexual marketplace being entirely the domian of rich people, whereas Houellebecq's characters described the sexual marketplace as all-encompassing.  Feminism was simply another example of things being allowed, but not possible.  Clouscard argued that it has served to divide the working class against itself (by agitating women against men, through labeling all men as oppressive "Phallocrats") in what he has dubbed "The prostitution economy."<ref> http://www.marxisme.wikibis.com/michel_clouscard.php  In French.</ref>


The novel was made into a [[Whatever - Extension du domaine de la lutte (movie)|film in 1999]].
The novel was made into a [[Whatever - Extension du domaine de la lutte (movie)|film in 1999]].

Navigation menu