Fakestream: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
14 bytes added ,  22 July 2019
Line 6: Line 6:
The media, pandering to [[feminism]], also often vilanizes men with low [[SMV]] who approach women under the allegation of "sexual harrassment"; A tactic that is being noticed by the [[manosphere]] because [[Chads]] are regularly exempted from those criticisms.
The media, pandering to [[feminism]], also often vilanizes men with low [[SMV]] who approach women under the allegation of "sexual harrassment"; A tactic that is being noticed by the [[manosphere]] because [[Chads]] are regularly exempted from those criticisms.


==Male disposability==
==Incel erasure/male disposability==
One of the main reasons why the MSM is unreliable is its adoption of one of the core [[bluepill]] tenets: male disposability. Blatant examples of this bluepilled misandrist propaganda is in its language-use wherein the MSM systematically engages in incel-erasure and romanticism of reverse rapists (i.e. female rapists). For example, if a woman engages in an act of rape, it is called "having sex" or having an affair". When a man does the exact same thing, he is called variations of "monster", "beast" or simply "rapist". Is this not evidence that the MSM is misandrist? Is this not evidence that the MSM is androphobic? Is this not evidence that the MSM is phallophobic? Why are female crimes romanticized whereas male crimes are portrayed as wicked? I'll tell you why this happens. Its because women have a womb, and a womb is more valuable than what men possess, i.e. sperm. Its for the same reason as why gold is more valuable than brass. They are both metals so why do people differentiate? Its because there's more brass in the world than gold; similarly, sperm is in much more plentiful supply than the female egg. Its called male disposability. Male problems are ignored. Male problems are no big deal and as such are swept under the carpet by the bluepilled media.  
One of the main reasons why the MSM is unreliable is its adoption of one of the core [[bluepill]] tenets: male disposability. Blatant examples of this bluepilled misandrist propaganda is in its language-use wherein the MSM systematically engages in incel-erasure and romanticism of reverse rapists (i.e. female rapists). For example, if a woman engages in an act of rape, it is called "having sex" or having an affair". When a man does the exact same thing, he is called variations of "monster", "beast" or simply "rapist". Is this not evidence that the MSM is misandrist? Is this not evidence that the MSM is androphobic? Is this not evidence that the MSM is phallophobic? Why are female crimes romanticized whereas male crimes are portrayed as wicked? I'll tell you why this happens. Its because women have a womb, and a womb is more valuable than what men possess, i.e. sperm. Its for the same reason as why gold is more valuable than brass. They are both metals so why do people differentiate? Its because there's more brass in the world than gold; similarly, sperm is in much more plentiful supply than the female egg. Its called male disposability. Male problems are ignored. Male problems are no big deal and as such are swept under the carpet by the bluepilled media.  


Navigation menu