2,849
edits
Bluepill: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:Bluepill.png|thumb|right]] | [[File:Bluepill.png|thumb|right]] | ||
The '''bluepill''' means unquestionably accepting what the MSM ([[mainstream media]]) and similar conventional sources have to say, and by extension, [[platitude|platitudes]] (i.e. [[chadsplaining]]) in the dating scene. It has developed to mean an inability to see nuance, a belief in the just-world hypothesis, being unenlightened to the | The '''bluepill''' means unquestionably accepting what the MSM ([[mainstream media]]) and similar conventional sources have to say, and by extension, [[platitude|platitudes]] (i.e. [[chadsplaining]]) in the dating scene. It has developed to mean an inability to see nuance, a belief in the just-world hypothesis which is accompanied by virtue-signalling, being unenlightened to the unpleasant realities of the world, views that align with cliches; and in the manosphere, extends to feminism. It is the preference of believing in comforting or convenient tropes, especially when it concerns a person's world view, with emphasis on the pretense or opinion that goes contrary to the research suggesting physical attraction is utmost in social or sexual situations. | ||
Because the pillars of bluepillery rest on holding a dominant societal viewpoint, bluepillers are much more prone to pigeonholing than the rest of the population. This propensity for pigeonholing is what makes the bluepilled mentality so dangerous. | Because the pillars of bluepillery rest on holding a dominant societal viewpoint, bluepillers are much more prone to pigeonholing than the rest of the population. This propensity for pigeonholing is what makes the bluepilled mentality so dangerous. | ||