2,849
edits
Bluepill: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:Bluepill.png|thumb|right]] | [[File:Bluepill.png|thumb|right]] | ||
The '''bluepill''' refers to someone who has not been enlightened to the harsh realities of the world. It has developed to mean an inability to see nuance, a belief in the just-world hypothesis, an overreliance on mainstream media as a moral guide, views that align with cliches and feminism. Within the dating scene, the bluepill alludes to [[platitude|platitudes]] (i.e. [[chadsplaining]]). It is the preference of believing in a comforting or convenient tropes, especially when it concerns a person's world view, with emphasis on the pretense or opinion that goes contrary to the research suggesting physical attraction is utmost in social or sexual situations. A | The '''bluepill''' refers to someone who has not been enlightened to the harsh realities of the world. It has developed to mean an inability to see nuance, a belief in the just-world hypothesis, an overreliance on mainstream media as a moral guide, views that align with cliches and feminism. Within the dating scene, the bluepill alludes to [[platitude|platitudes]] (i.e. [[chadsplaining]]). It is the preference of believing in a comforting or convenient tropes, especially when it concerns a person's world view, with emphasis on the pretense or opinion that goes contrary to the research suggesting physical attraction is utmost in social or sexual situations. A bluepiller who is male is often called a [[white knight]]. | ||
Bluepillers are recognizable by their susceptibility to voicing the argumentum ad populum fallacy. Although the bluepill and redpill are opposites, they do not necessarily equate to opposite political/social positions. The divergence pertains to ''how'' one has reached those positions. However being bluepilled is typically one's original belief system, i.e. the one you were brought up with. | Bluepillers are recognizable by their susceptibility to voicing the argumentum ad populum fallacy. Although the bluepill and redpill are opposites, they do not necessarily equate to opposite political/social positions. The divergence pertains to ''how'' one has reached those positions. However being bluepilled is typically one's original belief system, i.e. the one you were brought up with. | ||