2,849
edits
No edit summary |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:Bluepill.png|thumb|right]] | [[File:Bluepill.png|thumb|right]] | ||
The '''bluepill''' refers to someone who has not been enlightened to the harsh realities of the world. It has developed to mean an inability to see nuance, a belief in the just-world hypothesis, an overreliance on mainstream media as a moral guide, views that align with cliches and feminism. Within the dating scene, the bluepill alludes to [[platitude|platitudes]] (i.e. [[chadsplaining]]). It is the preference of believing in a comforting or convenient tropes, especially when it concerns a person's world view, with emphasis on the pretense or opinion that goes contrary to the research suggesting physical attraction is utmost in social or sexual situations. A person who holds bluepill views is sometimes called a bluepiller. | The '''bluepill''' refers to someone who has not been enlightened to the harsh realities of the world. It has developed to mean an inability to see nuance, a belief in the just-world hypothesis, an overreliance on mainstream media as a moral guide, views that align with cliches and feminism. Within the dating scene, the bluepill alludes to [[platitude|platitudes]] (i.e. [[chadsplaining]]). It is the preference of believing in a comforting or convenient tropes, especially when it concerns a person's world view, with emphasis on the pretense or opinion that goes contrary to the research suggesting physical attraction is utmost in social or sexual situations. A person who holds bluepill views is sometimes called a bluepiller. | ||
Bluepillers are recognizable by their susceptibility to voicing the argumentum ad populum fallacy. Although the bluepill and redpill are opposites, they do not necessarily equate to opposite political/social positions. The divergence pertains to ''how'' one has reached those positions. | |||
==As a majority viewpoint== | ==As a majority viewpoint== |