2,849
edits
Bluepill: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Interjections
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
*[[Platitude]] | *[[Platitude]] | ||
The debating style of bluepillers can befittingly be encapsulated by looking at their communicative styles which commonly consist of things such as mottos, slogans, sound bites, one-liners and cliches. From the viewpoint of the bluepilled, such one-liners are sufficient and do not require peer-reviewed additional evidence, because many others believe likewise. A bluepilled person, when faced with a room full of 40 people wherein 30 of those 40 (i.e. 75%) voice the same opinion, will nod his or her head in agreement with the 75%. In a sense, such a thought process is demeaning to human individuality as it normalizes the essence of the word ''sheeple''. | The debating style of bluepillers can befittingly be encapsulated by looking at their communicative styles which commonly consist of things such as mottos, slogans, sound bites, one-liners and cliches. From the viewpoint of the bluepilled, such one-liners are sufficient and do not require peer-reviewed additional evidence, because many others believe likewise. A bluepilled person, when faced with a room full of 40 people wherein 30 of those 40 (i.e. 75%) voice the same opinion, will nod his or her head in agreement with the 75%. In a sense, such a thought process is demeaning to human individuality as it normalizes the essence of the word ''sheeple''. Swallowing the bluepill also obstructs the flow of constructive dialogue. | ||
==Antibluepillers== | ==Antibluepillers== | ||