6,480
edits
Sexual Utopia in Power (book): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
(Added back previous text.) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:Utopia.jpg|thumb|right]] | [[File:Utopia.jpg|thumb|right]] | ||
'''Sexual Utopia in Power''' is a short book by American white-nationalist [[Roger Devlin]] which explains how the [[sexual revolution]] gave way to [[inceldom]]. | '''Sexual Utopia in Power''' is a short book by American white-nationalist [[Roger Devlin]](originally an article published in the white nationalist journal the Occidental Quarterly) which explains how the [[sexual revolution]] gave way to [[inceldom]] and led to the decline of monogamy in the west. | ||
It is a favorite book among [[MGTOW]]s although incels also generally agree with it, reaching many of the same conclusions without even hearing of the book. | It is a favorite book among [[MGTOW]]s although incels also generally agree with it, reaching many of the same conclusions without even hearing of the book. (Probably due to the books influence on the manosphere.) | ||
The book may be the beginning in a contemporary line of though about [[enforced monogamy]] which spread to [[Angela Nagle]] and then [[Jordan Peterson]]. | The book may be the beginning in a contemporary line of though about [[enforced monogamy]] which spread to [[Angela Nagle]] and then [[Jordan Peterson]]. | ||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
He then goes on to criticise the concept of 'date rape' and what he considers the feminist re-definition and weaponisation against men of the concept of rape in general. He goes on to argue that this feminist hostility towards men leads to the objecification of men and encourages women to take a callous and instrumental view of men. | He then goes on to criticise the concept of 'date rape' and what he considers the feminist re-definition and weaponisation against men of the concept of rape in general. He goes on to argue that this feminist hostility towards men leads to the objecification of men and encourages women to take a callous and instrumental view of men. | ||
He argues this feminist definition of rape is increasingly leading to men becoming what the manosphere would call [[Redpill| | He argues this feminist definition of rape is increasingly leading to men becoming what the manosphere would call [[Redpill|redpilled]] about women's nature and avoiding long term engagements with women, seeking instead to pump-and dump. He then argues that what women consider [[Creepiness|sexual harrasment]] is merely women resisting traditional courtship behaviour from [[Creepiness|unattractive men.]] He ominously states that this hostility towards men will result in increased violence and victimization of women by men disabused of their chivalrous conditioning and the dissapation of men's natural tendency to [[White knight|protect women from violence.]] | ||
He then goes on the argue that the sexual revolution has failed in its touted goal of ending sexual frustration by promoting 'free love'. He points out due to the natural human birth ratio producing more male offspring then female and women's natural tendency towards [[hypergamy]], that allowing women unimpeded sexual license will lead to the sexual dynamics of the great apes becoming apparent in human society, with the '[[Chad|top men']] monopolizing the majority of women. He argues this results in a vicious spiral due to the female mammalian instinct of mate-choice copying ( pre-selection) resulting in the cementing of a polyandrous status quo. | He then goes on the argue that the sexual revolution has failed in its touted goal of ending sexual frustration by promoting 'free love'. He points out due to the natural human birth ratio producing more male offspring then female and women's natural tendency towards [[hypergamy]], that allowing women unimpeded sexual license will lead to the sexual dynamics of the great apes becoming apparent in human society, with the '[[Chad|top men']] monopolizing the majority of women. He argues this results in a vicious spiral due to the female mammalian instinct of mate-choice copying ( pre-selection) resulting in the cementing of a polyandrous status quo. | ||
He then goes on to describe what he sees as an increasing phenomenon of female [[Femcel|spinsters]] who eschew sexual relations with men in their prime years of fertility. He argues that these women are merely [[Volceldom| | He then goes on to describe what he sees as an increasing phenomenon of female [[Femcel|spinsters]] who eschew sexual relations with men in their prime years of fertility. He argues that these women are merely [[Volceldom|voluntarily celibate]] women whose hypergamy is so out of control (due to the influence of the mass media expanding womens horizons in terms of thr attractiveness of men they are exposed to) that they see the vast majority of men as beneath them, until they hit [[The Wall]] and then are shocked and outraged when men who have adapted to the new sexual paradigm refuse to commit to them. | ||
He then details the ways in which he perceives that feminism has made many women un-marriageble; by making them hostile to the sexual advances of men and teaching them to view them in a defensive manner, by increasingly female promiscuity and encouraging un-feminine and uncouth behavior by them. He observed that if women had behaved in this manner throughout all history, the human race would hence be extinct. | He then details the ways in which he perceives that feminism has made many women un-marriageble; by making them hostile to the sexual advances of men and teaching them to view them in a defensive manner, by increasingly female promiscuity and encouraging un-feminine and uncouth behavior by them. He observed that if women had behaved in this manner throughout all history, the human race would hence be extinct. | ||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
The next part of the work deals with what Devlin describes as '[[Inceldom|the forgotten men.]]' | The next part of the work deals with what Devlin describes as '[[Inceldom|the forgotten men.]]' | ||
He states that there exists a 'silent majority' of sex starved young men who fail to complain about their plight due to male bravado, instead spending their youth [[Wagecuck|toiling away]] in the hopes of eventually being able to [[Betabux|provide for]] a prospective mate. He then details that | He states that there exists a 'silent majority' of sex starved young men who fail to complain about their plight due to male bravado, instead spending their youth [[Wagecuck|toiling away]] in the hopes of eventually being able to [[Betabux|provide for]] a prospective mate. He then details that men see getting 'used goods' that other men got in in their prime for free as a bad deal and are instead [[MGTOW|going their own way.]] He states that white women are the new 'white mans burden' that they are beginning to shrug off. | ||
He then describes what he sees as a 'sexual thermidor' (i.e a state of mass hysteria compared to the French revolutionary terror presided over by the Jacobins where thousands were sentenced to death and guillotined without due process) developing where men are being terrorised into avoiding socialising all together with women out of fear of false sexual harrasment and rape claims. | He then describes what he sees as a 'sexual thermidor' (i.e a state of mass hysteria compared to the French revolutionary terror presided over by the Jacobins where thousands were sentenced to death and guillotined without due process) developing where men are being terrorised into avoiding socialising all together with women out of fear of false sexual harrasment and rape claims. | ||