Trusted, Automoderated users
17,538
edits
| Line 3,465: | Line 3,465: | ||
Nonetheless, the result points to substantial sex differences in variance of reproductive success. Earlier DNA studies by Wilder and colleges (2004) estimated the historical sex ratio of reproductive success to be 2:1. Half the branches on a tree of ancestors represent males, but half of the males are repeats. Possibly 80% of women, but only 40% of men (i.e. half as many) have reproduced. | Nonetheless, the result points to substantial sex differences in variance of reproductive success. Earlier DNA studies by Wilder and colleges (2004) estimated the historical sex ratio of reproductive success to be 2:1. Half the branches on a tree of ancestors represent males, but half of the males are repeats. Possibly 80% of women, but only 40% of men (i.e. half as many) have reproduced. | ||
It could also be 90% vs. 45%, or 50% vs. 25% | It could also be 90% vs. 45%, or 50% vs. 25%, depending on how many have made it to reproductive age at all | ||
The observation that males (humans and in the animal kingdom in general) exhibit a greater variance in reproductive success as compared to females is known as [[Bateman's Principle]]. | The observation that males (humans and in the animal kingdom in general) exhibit a greater variance in reproductive success as compared to females is known as [[Bateman's Principle]]. | ||