Trusted, Automoderated users
17,538
edits
| Line 1,495: | Line 1,495: | ||
==<span style="font-family:'Linux Libertine, Georgia, Times, serif'; font-size:40px; font-weight: normal;">''Looks (Love)''</span>== | ==<span style="font-family:'Linux Libertine, Georgia, Times, serif'; font-size:40px; font-weight: normal;">''Looks (Love)''</span>== | ||
{{main_article|[[Beauty]] and [[Lookism]]}} | |||
===<span style="font-family:'Linux Libertine, Georgia, Times, serif'; font-size: 24px; line-height: 1.2; font-weight: normal;" id="Women_feel_sexual_disgust_when_they_imagine_even_talking_to_an_unattractive_man">Women feel sexual disgust when they imagine even talking to an unattractive man</span>=== | ===<span style="font-family:'Linux Libertine, Georgia, Times, serif'; font-size: 24px; line-height: 1.2; font-weight: normal;" id="Women_feel_sexual_disgust_when_they_imagine_even_talking_to_an_unattractive_man">Women feel sexual disgust when they imagine even talking to an unattractive man</span>=== | ||
| Line 1,579: | Line 1,581: | ||
* Zsok F, Haucke M, De Wit CY, Barelds DP. 2017. ''What kind of love is love at first sight? An empirical investigation.'' Personal Relationships. 24: 869-885. [[https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/pere.12218 Abstract]] [[https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321133457_What_kind_of_love_is_love_at_first_sight_An_empirical_investigation FullText]] [[https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/meet-catch-and-keep/201801/is-love-first-sight-real Summary]] | * Zsok F, Haucke M, De Wit CY, Barelds DP. 2017. ''What kind of love is love at first sight? An empirical investigation.'' Personal Relationships. 24: 869-885. [[https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/pere.12218 Abstract]] [[https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321133457_What_kind_of_love_is_love_at_first_sight_An_empirical_investigation FullText]] [[https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/meet-catch-and-keep/201801/is-love-first-sight-real Summary]] | ||
===<span style="font-family:'Linux Libertine, Georgia, Times, serif'; font-size: 24px; line-height: 1.2; font-weight: normal;" id="Looks_are_most_important_to_women_in_speed_dating">Looks are most important | ===<span style="font-family:'Linux Libertine, Georgia, Times, serif'; font-size: 24px; line-height: 1.2; font-weight: normal;" id="Looks_are_most_important_to_women_in_speed_dating">Looks are most important in speed dating</span>=== | ||
<div class="navbar" style="padding-left: 4px; margin-top: 3px; background: #EAEAEA; color: #555; border-top: 2px solid #444; border-bottom: 1px solid #444; font-size: 13px">[[#Looks_are_most_important_to_women_in_speed_dating|permalink]] | [[#tocLooks_.28Love.29|category: Looks (Love)]] | [[#tocLooks_are_most_important_to_women_in_speed_dating|table of contents]]</div> | <div class="navbar" style="padding-left: 4px; margin-top: 3px; background: #EAEAEA; color: #555; border-top: 2px solid #444; border-bottom: 1px solid #444; font-size: 13px">[[#Looks_are_most_important_to_women_in_speed_dating|permalink]] | [[#tocLooks_.28Love.29|category: Looks (Love)]] | [[#tocLooks_are_most_important_to_women_in_speed_dating|table of contents]]</div> | ||
Luo & Zhang (2009) conducted a speed-dating experiment which consisted of (N = 108) participants divided into two equal opposite sex groups. Before the speed-dating event, the participants completed a battery of psychometric tests and surveys designed to measure the big-five personality traits, attachment style, self-esteem, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affect_(psychology) affectivity], interests and political and personal values. Six speed dating events were conducted, each 60 minutes in length. | Luo & Zhang (2009) conducted a speed-dating experiment which consisted of (N = 108) participants divided into two equal opposite sex groups. Before the speed-dating event, the participants completed a battery of psychometric tests and surveys designed to measure the big-five personality traits, attachment style, self-esteem, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affect_(psychology) affectivity], interests and political and personal values. Six speed dating events were conducted, each 60 minutes in length. | ||
| Line 1,603: | Line 1,605: | ||
* Luo S, Zhang G. 2009. ''What leads to romantic attraction: similarity, reciprocity, security, or beauty? Evidence from a speed-dating study.'' J Pers. 77(4): 933-64. [[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19558447 Abstract]] | * Luo S, Zhang G. 2009. ''What leads to romantic attraction: similarity, reciprocity, security, or beauty? Evidence from a speed-dating study.'' J Pers. 77(4): 933-64. [[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19558447 Abstract]] | ||
===<span style="font-family:'Linux Libertine, Georgia, Times, serif'; font-size: 24px; line-height: 1.2; font-weight: normal;" id="Looks_are_most_important_to_women_in_video_dating">Looks are most important | ===<span style="font-family:'Linux Libertine, Georgia, Times, serif'; font-size: 24px; line-height: 1.2; font-weight: normal;" id="Looks_are_most_important_to_women_in_video_dating">Looks are most important in video dating</span>=== | ||
<div class="navbar" style="padding-left: 4px; margin-top: 3px; background: #EAEAEA; color: #555; border-top: 2px solid #444; border-bottom: 1px solid #444; font-size: 13px">[[#Looks_are_most_important_to_women_in_video_dating|permalink]] | [[#tocLooks_.28Love.29|category: Looks (Love)]] | [[#tocLooks_are_most_important_to_women_in_video_dating|table of contents]]</div> | <div class="navbar" style="padding-left: 4px; margin-top: 3px; background: #EAEAEA; color: #555; border-top: 2px solid #444; border-bottom: 1px solid #444; font-size: 13px">[[#Looks_are_most_important_to_women_in_video_dating|permalink]] | [[#tocLooks_.28Love.29|category: Looks (Love)]] | [[#tocLooks_are_most_important_to_women_in_video_dating|table of contents]]</div> | ||
Olderbak et al. conducted a video dating study consisting of sample of N = 102 participants (56% women, mean age 18.85 years) all university undergraduates. The participants completed several self-report questionnaires, including the mate value inventory (measure of traits that are desired in a romantic partner), questionnaires designed to measure [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_history_theory life history strategy], | Olderbak et al. conducted a video dating study consisting of sample of N = 102 participants (56% women, mean age 18.85 years) all university undergraduates. The participants completed several self-report questionnaires, including the mate value inventory (measure of traits that are desired in a romantic partner), questionnaires designed to measure [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_history_theory life history strategy], | ||
| Line 1,624: | Line 1,626: | ||
* Olderbak SG, Malter F, Wolf PSA, Jones DN, Figueredo AJ. 2017. ''Predicting Romantic Interest at Zero Acquaintance: Evidence of Sex Differences in Trait Perception but Not in Predictors of Interest.'' European Journal of Personality. 31(1): 42-62. [[https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/per.2087 Abstract]] | * Olderbak SG, Malter F, Wolf PSA, Jones DN, Figueredo AJ. 2017. ''Predicting Romantic Interest at Zero Acquaintance: Evidence of Sex Differences in Trait Perception but Not in Predictors of Interest.'' European Journal of Personality. 31(1): 42-62. [[https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/per.2087 Abstract]] | ||
===<span style="font-family:'Linux Libertine, Georgia, Times, serif'; font-size: 24px; line-height: 1.2; font-weight: normal;" id="Looks_are_most_important_to_women_in_blind_dating">Looks are most important | ===<span style="font-family:'Linux Libertine, Georgia, Times, serif'; font-size: 24px; line-height: 1.2; font-weight: normal;" id="Looks_are_most_important_to_women_in_blind_dating">Looks are most important in blind dating</span>=== | ||
<div class="navbar" style="padding-left: 4px; margin-top: 3px; background: #EAEAEA; color: #555; border-top: 2px solid #444; border-bottom: 1px solid #444; font-size: 13px">[[#Looks_are_most_important_to_women_in_blind_dating|permalink]] | [[#tocLooks_.28Love.29|category: Looks (Love)]] | [[#tocLooks_are_most_important_to_women_in_blind_dating|table of contents]]</div> | <div class="navbar" style="padding-left: 4px; margin-top: 3px; background: #EAEAEA; color: #555; border-top: 2px solid #444; border-bottom: 1px solid #444; font-size: 13px">[[#Looks_are_most_important_to_women_in_blind_dating|permalink]] | [[#tocLooks_.28Love.29|category: Looks (Love)]] | [[#tocLooks_are_most_important_to_women_in_blind_dating|table of contents]]</div> | ||
Walster et al. (1966) conducted a field experiment consisting of a "computer dance", also known as ''Walster's computer dating study'', in which they organized blind dates by an old IBM punch-card computer to test their hypothesis of assortative mating (that people tend to date others in their own 'league' of attractiveness, wealth, status, personality etc.). Four raters (college sophomores) rated the subjects (N = 752) on a 8 point scale for physical attractiveness ranging from "very unattractive" to "very attractive". | Walster et al. (1966) conducted a field experiment consisting of a "computer dance", also known as ''Walster's computer dating study'', in which they organized blind dates by an old IBM punch-card computer to test their hypothesis of assortative mating (that people tend to date others in their own 'league' of attractiveness, wealth, status, personality etc.). Four raters (college sophomores) rated the subjects (N = 752) on a 8 point scale for physical attractiveness ranging from "very unattractive" to "very attractive". | ||