Trusted, Automoderated users
17,538
edits
Jordan Peterson: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Beliefs and philosophy
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
Peterson claims that in order to prevent cultural dissolution, states need an overarching goal such as economic growth or religious/transcendental goals and a fair amount of uniformity and hierarchical organization, which he also believes to be necessary for human well-being. | Peterson claims that in order to prevent cultural dissolution, states need an overarching goal such as economic growth or religious/transcendental goals and a fair amount of uniformity and hierarchical organization, which he also believes to be necessary for human well-being. | ||
To avoid corrupt hierarchies, he claims, it is necessary to keep them fairly flat (decentralization) and use regulated free market such that the best players prevail and inefficient/corrupt players get outcompeted/destroyed by better ones. He regards boundaries and social norms as fundamental for a functioning state, but admits there also needs to be some adaptability and flow of information (free speech) to avoid totalitarianism and warfare (''classical liberalism''). He claims it is naive to assume there is a definite set of rules for ideally structuring a state (ideology), except for leaving up the determination of the rules to a competitive process, free speech and democracy. For this reason, men need to be socialized to be competitive and dependable. Peterson is wary of some technological advancements such as automation, fearing it could lead to | To avoid corrupt hierarchies, he claims, it is necessary to keep them fairly flat (decentralization) and use regulated free market such that the best players prevail and inefficient/corrupt players get outcompeted/destroyed by better ones. He regards boundaries and social norms as fundamental for a functioning state, but admits there also needs to be some adaptability and flow of information (free speech) to avoid totalitarianism and warfare (''classical liberalism''). He claims it is naive to assume there is a definite set of rules for ideally structuring a state (ideology), except for leaving up the determination of the rules to a competitive process, free speech and democracy. For this reason, men need to be socialized to be competitive and dependable. He also sees cultural norms that admit primacy to the individual as essential for social stability. For this reason, Peterson is wary of some technological advancements such as automation, fearing it could lead to diminishing value of the individual being outcompeted by machines. | ||
This concludes the secular side—Peterson also has a series of esoteric views about ''Jungian archetypes'' in human literature and ancient religious scripture, that exist across time and space, shaped by gene-meme co-evolution to capture deeper truths about human nature than the typical modern naturalistically inclined person would assume. He partly uses this framework of human culture to justify the importance of traditions. | This concludes the secular side—Peterson also has a series of esoteric views about ''Jungian archetypes'' in human literature and ancient religious scripture, that exist across time and space, shaped by gene-meme co-evolution to capture deeper truths about human nature than the typical modern naturalistically inclined person would assume. He partly uses this framework of human culture to justify the importance of traditions. | ||