Nonredamancy: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
(Created page with "Nonredamancy is a more formal way of describing the friendzone. It basically refers to the situation wherein one makes efforts to romantically connect with a person and faces...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Nonredamancy is a more formal way of describing the friendzone. It basically refers to the situation wherein one makes efforts to romantically connect with a person and faces rejection, nonreciprocity and unrequitedness. Although rejection is normal and even something which [[normies]] should anticipate, the rate at which people face nonredamancy varies widely. Whereas it is possible that top decilers such as [[Francisco Lachowski]] don't even know what nonredamancy feels like, bottom decilers such as [[Joseph Merrick]] (elephant man) will probably face a stupendous amount of nonredamancy. | Nonredamancy is a more formal way of describing the friendzone. It basically refers to the situation wherein one makes efforts to romantically connect with a person and faces only rejection, nonreciprocity and unrequitedness. The most common side-effects of nonredamancy are sexlessness, perpetual singehood and isolation. | ||
Although rejection is normal and even something which [[normies]] should anticipate, the rate at which people face nonredamancy varies widely. Whereas it is possible that top decilers such as [[Francisco Lachowski]] don't even know what nonredamancy feels like, bottom decilers such as [[Joseph Merrick]] (elephant man) will probably face a stupendous amount of nonredamancy. | |||
Since [[cold approach]]es and [[warm approach]]es are primarily a male domain, women are often similar to Lachowski in that they typically are unaware of what nonredamancy feels like. This obliviousness is one of the reasons those in the [[incelosphere]] tend to be perplexed whenever they see a female journalist writing about male sexuality. In the [[cybercel]]'s mind, this makes zero sense since a female cannot possible have any inkling of what the male experience is like. One demographic that is well-acquainted with nonredamancy is those on the [[inceldom spectrum]]. What separates normies from those on the inceldom spectrum is that whereas normies may experience nonredamancy at an intermittent rate, for the latter, nonredamancy is perpetual; hence the neologism '''perpetual nonredamancy'''. | Since [[cold approach]]es and [[warm approach]]es are primarily a male domain, women are often similar to Lachowski in that they typically are unaware of what nonredamancy feels like. This obliviousness is one of the reasons those in the [[incelosphere]] tend to be perplexed whenever they see a female journalist writing about male sexuality. In the [[cybercel]]'s mind, this makes zero sense since a female cannot possible have any inkling of what the male experience is like. One demographic that is well-acquainted with nonredamancy is those on the [[inceldom spectrum]]. What separates normies from those on the inceldom spectrum is that whereas normies may experience nonredamancy at an intermittent rate, for the latter, nonredamancy is perpetual; hence the neologism '''perpetual nonredamancy'''. | ||