Difference between revisions of "Beauty"

From Incel Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
[[File:Eugen_von_Blaas_-_Two_Venetian_Women.jpg|thumb|right|200px|Two Venetian Women by Eugen von Blaas (1898)]]
 
[[File:Eugen_von_Blaas_-_Two_Venetian_Women.jpg|thumb|right|200px|Two Venetian Women by Eugen von Blaas (1898)]]
 
[[File:1200px-Venere_Callipige_Napoli.jpg|thumb|right|200px|Venus Callipyge (''Venus or Aphrodite of the beautiful buttocks'') by anonymous artist 1st or 2nd century BC (White marble, National Archaeological Museum, Naples).]]
 
[[File:1200px-Venere_Callipige_Napoli.jpg|thumb|right|200px|Venus Callipyge (''Venus or Aphrodite of the beautiful buttocks'') by anonymous artist 1st or 2nd century BC (White marble, National Archaeological Museum, Naples).]]
'''Beauty''' in humans and animals refers to aesthetic appearance, an aspect of [[looks]].
+
'''Beauty''' in humans and animals refers to aesthetic appearance, an aspect of [[looks]].
 
Beauty is often [[sexual attractiveness|sexually attractive]] to the opposite sex and it is important for [[dominance hierarchy|social status]] in humans.<ref>https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#A_man.27s_looks_are_significantly_correlated_with_his_popularity_and_peer_status</ref>
 
Beauty is often [[sexual attractiveness|sexually attractive]] to the opposite sex and it is important for [[dominance hierarchy|social status]] in humans.<ref>https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#A_man.27s_looks_are_significantly_correlated_with_his_popularity_and_peer_status</ref>
Some believe beauty and ugliness are [[social constructionism|subjective]], but they are [[Scientific_Blackpill#Beauty_is_objective_and_measurable_in_the_brain|mostly objective]],<ref>http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0001201</ref> especially in case of [[Scientific_Blackpill#Beauty_is_objective_and_measurable_in_the_brain|very ugly people]]. Physical attractiveness strongly predicts initial romantic interest and moderately based on others' ratings, to the same degree in men and women.<ref>https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#Looks_are_most_important_to_women_in_blind_dating</ref>
+
Beauty is [[Scientific_Blackpill#Beauty_is_objective_and_measurable_in_the_brain|mostly objective]],<ref>http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0001201</ref> especially in case of [[Scientific_Blackpill#Beauty_is_objective_and_measurable_in_the_brain|very ugly people]].
A single glance of 100 milliseconds is sufficient to form reliable, consensual impressions about physical attractiveness.<ref>http://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617732388</ref>
+
Physical attractiveness strongly predicts initial romantic interest and moderately based on others' ratings, to the same degree in men and women.<ref>https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#Looks_are_most_important_to_women_in_blind_dating</ref>
Beauty is [[Scientific_Blackpill#Attractive_people_are_perceived_much_more_positively_than_they_really_are|misperceived]] to be strongly related to various positive traits such as intelligence and health, which is called the ''beauty-is-good stereotype'', a certain kind of [[halo effect]] (see [[#Correlations|correlations]]). It seems, men are largely incapable of accurately judging their own looks, different from women.<ref>http://doi.org/10.2307/3033724</ref>
+
Humans judge beauty within less than a second.<ref>http://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617732388</ref> and beauty is [[Scientific_Blackpill#Attractive_people_are_perceived_much_more_positively_than_they_really_are|misperceived]] to be strongly related to various positive traits such as intelligence and health, which is called the ''beauty-is-good stereotype'', a certain kind of [[halo effect]]. Men and women are fairly bad judging their physical attractiveness especially men.<ref>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/sjop.12631</ref><ref>http://doi.org/10.2307/3033724</ref>
  
 
== Objective vs subjective ==
 
== Objective vs subjective ==
  
One can distinguish two kinds of beauty:<ref>https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#Beauty_is_objective_and_measurable_in_the_brain</ref>
+
One can distinguish objective and subjective preferences for body shapes.<ref>https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#Beauty_is_objective_and_measurable_in_the_brain</ref>
 +
Objective preferences are inherited, so everyone mostly agrees on them. Subjective preferences are acquired through emotional experience.
  
<ul><li>
+
Objective beauty is mostly about mathematical/geometric simplicity, which includes symmetry, smoothness, averageness, repetitions and elegance.
'''Objective beauty''': Objective preferences are not acquired by experience, but consist of inherited circuits in the brain, so everyone mostly agrees on it.
+
It has been proposed many animal brains have a natural preference for this because simplicity is ''easy to process'', which is called the ''processing fluency theory of aesthetic pleasure''.<ref>https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3</ref><ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Processing_fluency_theory_of_aesthetic_pleasure</ref><ref>https://www.apa.org/monitor/oct06/pretty</ref>
<ul><li>
+
 
'''Simplicity''': The brain analyzes the mathematical/geometric beauty of percepts, such as symmetry, smoothness, averageness, elegance, or generally ''simplicity''.
+
An example may be that even blind men prefer women's elegant hourglass-shaped body, suggesting men are born with this aesthetic preference.<ref>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.10.001</ref>
The brain appears to prefer this because it is ''easy to process'' which appears to be common to many higher animals (''processing fluency theory of aesthetic pleasure'').<ref>https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3</ref><ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Processing_fluency_theory_of_aesthetic_pleasure</ref><ref>https://www.apa.org/monitor/oct06/pretty</ref>
+
 
</li><li>
+
In many animals ornament can also be very complex rather than simple, however it is simple in that the pattern repeats itself.
'''Patterns''': What is objectively regarded as beautiful or sexually attractive may go beyond simplicity, namely in [[sexual dimorphism|sexually dimorphism]], e.g. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secondary_sex_characteristic secondary sex characteristics].
 
Such preferences often involve seemingly arbitrary, exaggerated and/or very specific patterns ([[Millimeters of bone|few millimeters of bone]]).
 
For example even blind men prefer women's hourglass shaped body which means they are born with a preference for a particular pattern in the opposite sex.<ref>https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.10.001</ref> Other examples are large and firm female breasts<ref>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ajhb.23287</ref> or large penises, certain nose shapes, a robust mandible, protruding cheekbones, [[compact midface]] and [[hunter eyes]] in men, as well as dimples on back or cheeks, muscle tone, cleavage, thigh gap, abs crack, six pack (see also [[:Category:Aesthetics|aesthetics]]), and complex coloration patterns and ornament in some higher animals.
 
</li></ul>
 
</li><li>
 
'''Subjective beauty''': Subjective preferences for beauty are acquired by individual emotional experience or [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mere_exposure_effect mere exposure], or result from variance in development of the inherited neuronal circuitry for detecting objective beauty as described above.
 
</li></ul>
 
  
 
== Evolution of beauty ==
 
== Evolution of beauty ==
  
Animal's preference for objective beauty as mathematical simplicity is a fluke of evolution, resulting from the actually useful preference for order and predictability (processing fluency).
+
<!--
 +
Other examples are large and firm female breasts<ref>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ajhb.23287</ref> or large penises-->
 +
The processing fluency hypothesis suggests that animal's preference for objective beauty as mathematical simplicity is a fluke of evolution, resulting from the actually useful preference for order and predictability.
 
Due to this preference, animals tended to choose mathematically beautiful mates and hence species evolved to be beautiful (''aesthetic sexual selection'') and beauty became an important factor of sexual attraction.
 
Due to this preference, animals tended to choose mathematically beautiful mates and hence species evolved to be beautiful (''aesthetic sexual selection'') and beauty became an important factor of sexual attraction.
 
Some deep sea fish may be particularly ugly due to being blind.
 
Some deep sea fish may be particularly ugly due to being blind.
Line 34: Line 30:
 
This explains why even blind animals and plants are often beautiful.
 
This explains why even blind animals and plants are often beautiful.
 
Though, some flowers may have also evolved beauty and scents to be particularly salient to insects which spread their pollen.
 
Though, some flowers may have also evolved beauty and scents to be particularly salient to insects which spread their pollen.
And also in many animals, beauty has the same function of [[slut|''conspicuously advertising'']] oneself to the opposite sex.
+
Similarly, many animals use beauty to [[slut|''conspicuously advertise'']] themselves to the opposite sex.
For this reason, human females can use flowers as adornment to attract males since flowers happen to fulfill the same function.
+
For this reason, human females use flowers as adornment to get men's attention since flowers happen to fulfill the same function.
Attraction to secondary sexual characteristics also increases fitness because seeking out the opposite sex is conductive for reproduction.
+
Attraction to secondary sexual characteristics generally increases fitness because seeking out the opposite sex is conductive for reproduction.
  
 
Feedback loops in sexual selection such as [[Fisherian runaway]] and ''sensory bias''<ref>Fuller, R. C., Houle, D., & Travis, J. 2005. ''Sensory Bias as an Explanation for the Evolution of Mate Preferences.'' [[https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/444443 Abstract]]</ref> can explain why secondary sexual characteristics are overcomplicated and enlarged in some animals, and they can also explain the immense sexual attraction to very specific shapes ([[few millimeters of bone]]) despite them having barely any relevance for survival except "social survival".
 
Feedback loops in sexual selection such as [[Fisherian runaway]] and ''sensory bias''<ref>Fuller, R. C., Houle, D., & Travis, J. 2005. ''Sensory Bias as an Explanation for the Evolution of Mate Preferences.'' [[https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/444443 Abstract]]</ref> can explain why secondary sexual characteristics are overcomplicated and enlarged in some animals, and they can also explain the immense sexual attraction to very specific shapes ([[few millimeters of bone]]) despite them having barely any relevance for survival except "social survival".
Since these runaway selection also exaggerates and narrows preferences, this may also explain phenomena like women readily copulating with [[sexy son hypothesis|sexy men]] despite being coy otherwise, as well as ''love on first sight'', [[oneitis]], [[porn]], [[uncanny valley]] and aversion to other races.
+
Runaway selection narrows or stabilizes preferences explaining [[millimeters of bone]], [[uncanny valley]] and aversion to other races.
 +
Runaway selection also exaggerates preferences,which may explain phenomena such as women readily copulating with [[sexy son hypothesis|sexy men]] despite being coy otherwise, as well as ''love on first sight'', [[oneitis]] and [[porn]].
  
 
Another explanation for beauty is that it acts as an ''honest signal'' of e.g. health, mutational load and intelligence, can thus signal ''good genes'' overall.
 
Another explanation for beauty is that it acts as an ''honest signal'' of e.g. health, mutational load and intelligence, can thus signal ''good genes'' overall.

Revision as of 19:13, 23 March 2020

Two Venetian Women by Eugen von Blaas (1898)
Venus Callipyge (Venus or Aphrodite of the beautiful buttocks) by anonymous artist 1st or 2nd century BC (White marble, National Archaeological Museum, Naples).

Beauty in humans and animals refers to aesthetic appearance, an aspect of looks. Beauty is often sexually attractive to the opposite sex and it is important for social status in humans.[1] Beauty is mostly objective,[2] especially in case of very ugly people. Physical attractiveness strongly predicts initial romantic interest and moderately based on others' ratings, to the same degree in men and women.[3] Humans judge beauty within less than a second.[4] and beauty is misperceived to be strongly related to various positive traits such as intelligence and health, which is called the beauty-is-good stereotype, a certain kind of halo effect. Men and women are fairly bad judging their physical attractiveness especially men.[5][6]

Objective vs subjective

One can distinguish objective and subjective preferences for body shapes.[7] Objective preferences are inherited, so everyone mostly agrees on them. Subjective preferences are acquired through emotional experience.

Objective beauty is mostly about mathematical/geometric simplicity, which includes symmetry, smoothness, averageness, repetitions and elegance. It has been proposed many animal brains have a natural preference for this because simplicity is easy to process, which is called the processing fluency theory of aesthetic pleasure.[8][9][10]

An example may be that even blind men prefer women's elegant hourglass-shaped body, suggesting men are born with this aesthetic preference.[11]

In many animals ornament can also be very complex rather than simple, however it is simple in that the pattern repeats itself.

Evolution of beauty

The processing fluency hypothesis suggests that animal's preference for objective beauty as mathematical simplicity is a fluke of evolution, resulting from the actually useful preference for order and predictability. Due to this preference, animals tended to choose mathematically beautiful mates and hence species evolved to be beautiful (aesthetic sexual selection) and beauty became an important factor of sexual attraction. Some deep sea fish may be particularly ugly due to being blind.

Simple and elegant body shapes can, however, also result from optimizing resource efficiency or resilience. This explains why even blind animals and plants are often beautiful. Though, some flowers may have also evolved beauty and scents to be particularly salient to insects which spread their pollen. Similarly, many animals use beauty to conspicuously advertise themselves to the opposite sex. For this reason, human females use flowers as adornment to get men's attention since flowers happen to fulfill the same function. Attraction to secondary sexual characteristics generally increases fitness because seeking out the opposite sex is conductive for reproduction.

Feedback loops in sexual selection such as Fisherian runaway and sensory bias[12] can explain why secondary sexual characteristics are overcomplicated and enlarged in some animals, and they can also explain the immense sexual attraction to very specific shapes (few millimeters of bone) despite them having barely any relevance for survival except "social survival". Runaway selection narrows or stabilizes preferences explaining millimeters of bone, uncanny valley and aversion to other races. Runaway selection also exaggerates preferences,which may explain phenomena such as women readily copulating with sexy men despite being coy otherwise, as well as love on first sight, oneitis and porn.

Another explanation for beauty is that it acts as an honest signal of e.g. health, mutational load and intelligence, can thus signal good genes overall. These two opposing views the Good Geners vs Fisherians lead to significant academic rivalry since the 1990s,[13] but the good genes hypotheses has largely been refuted since. The relation between beauty to health and ability is only relevant for certain cases like disfigurement, certain syndromes and skin rashes and the like. Beauty and health are overall only weakly related (see correlations), but slight fitness advantages could have also initiated feedback loops in sexual selection.

Historically, parents have been heavily involved in their offspring's mate choices,[14] so quite likely feedback loops in sexual aesthetic selection have also shaped parents to be choosy about looks (sexy grandchildren), and, due to the similarity of socializing with potential partners for their offspring with socializing in general, people have evolved to be choosy about looks of the people they socialize with, explaining why looks influence men's social status somewhat.

Beautiful behavior

Not just looks, but also behavior can be beautiful and sexually attractive, such as facial expressiveness, gait, physiognomy, tone and clarity of the voice, or more generally charisma. Analogously to objective beauty described above, beautiful behavior has elegance, confidence, poise and wit, i.e. it can be processed fluently.

The opposite is awkwardness, lethargy, stuttering, violation of norms, autism, inappropriate laughter, delayed response, anxiety etc. Aesthetic sexual selection possibly played a role in the evolution of these behaviors, especially as they lack obvious survival value apart from being socially advantageous.[15] Also, in some birds, fish and other species one can observe animals (especially male ones) competing in performance of complex behaviors (courtship display), which ranges from courtship dances[16] to construction of aesthetically pleasing nest formations.[17][18] In the same manner, higher human cognition has been suggested to have largely evolved by sexual selection as a "cognitive ornament".[19][20]

The failure of any personality traits and intelligence to predict initial romantic interest in blind and semi-blind settings,[21][22][23] however, suggests sexually selected beautiful behavior is limited to rather momentary, superficial and sub-personality behaviors such as facial expressions and, perhaps singing, dance movements, and overall smoothness and neurotypicality.

Male dancers of the Wodaabe African tribe (see video) are a clear example of men showing off sexual adaptations for facial expressiveness, fine control of facial muscles, glances, smiling, sense of style and adornment, singing, chanting, whistling, as well as the white of the eye (sclera), straight white teeth, all of which are possibly sexual/aesthetic adaptations. Wodaabes believe men who are not physically beautiful can make up for it with togu (game)[24] and flirting with poetic speech patterns called sweet tongue,[25] i.e. beautiful behavior. Such courtship performances have striking resemblance with modern day jestermaxxing and tindermaxxing. People on the autism spectrum often lack fine control of their facial muscles or body overall.[26] Dance performances with rhythmic and rocking motions, delicate hand movements, and overall elegance, poise[27] and coolness are seen in many indigenous cultures, so these behaviors are generally potential candidates for being primarily sexual adaptations as they evidently played an important role in mate selection for both men and women, as can be seen by women also being involved in dances, instead of just watching the males dance.

The Wodaabe women of Niger judge their men in a tribal beauty contest

 
Traditional dance in Bali (1936)

Correlations

Predicted probabilities by an adjusted logistic model (not actual probabilities)

Due to the halo effect, good looking people are generally considered more positively than they are on average.[28] In truth, good looks do not correlate with anything very much.

Beauty is only slightly negatively related to criminality,[29] and beauty is at best very weakly related to intelligence. A recent meta study of 1,753 identical and fraternal twins and their siblings found no correlation between facial attractiveness and IQ, and suggested studies that previously found a weak correlation suffered from halo effect as they involved attractiveness ratings of acquaintances.[30] The halo effect of attractiveness on perceived intelligence is pretty significant.[31][32]

Beauty also only weakly correlated with health. Science that purported a link between facial fluctuating asymmetry and health has been exposed as outright scientific fraud.[33] A survey study by Henderson et al. (2015) summarized:

Contrary to the hypothesis that symmetry cues health, the largest study of facial asymmetry and health to date found no relationship between these variables. Researchers used data from a British cohort study of 4732 individuals and found that facial symmetry at age 15 was unrelated to longitudinal measures of childhood health, including measures of the proportion of childhood years spent unwell, average number of illness symptoms per year, and total number of infections.[34]

Different aspects of beauty are also not inter-correlated, e.g. no correlation between attractive faces and attractive voices.[35]

The waist-to-hip-ratio/fertility link is weak at best.[36]

The relationship between health and mating success is weak, i.e. people select for physical attractiveness rather than health.[37] Physical unattractiveness only correlates weakly with general health (r = .13, p < .001). See the figure on the right for predicted probabilities for various diseases, controlled for age, sex, race, income and parents' income.[38] The causality is unclear. Ugliness could cause social exclusion, making them depressed which increases their blood pressure and causes other chronic diseases, or disease could be caused by the environment and the disease may reduce looks (e.g. eye circles and wrinkles), but "bad genes" (a general fitness factor) could also cause both ugliness and bad health.

Deeper male voice is not linked to immunocompetence even though women are strongly attracted to it.[39][40] A deep voice in particular may mainly have the purpose of intimidating other men, i.e. intrasexual competition.[41][42]

In summary, beauty in humans, which is mostly averageness, smoothness and symmetry, is not a certificate for health or ability. Even though it may slightly signal developmental stability due to low mutational load, it mostly seems to be just ornament, so its main biological purpose is to be sexually attractive. Runaway selection may explain our exaggerated preference for it,[43] and why people undergo risks improving their looks by plastic surgeries.

See also

References

  1. https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#A_man.27s_looks_are_significantly_correlated_with_his_popularity_and_peer_status
  2. http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0001201
  3. https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#Looks_are_most_important_to_women_in_blind_dating
  4. http://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617732388
  5. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/sjop.12631
  6. http://doi.org/10.2307/3033724
  7. https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#Beauty_is_objective_and_measurable_in_the_brain
  8. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3
  9. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Processing_fluency_theory_of_aesthetic_pleasure
  10. https://www.apa.org/monitor/oct06/pretty
  11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.10.001
  12. Fuller, R. C., Houle, D., & Travis, J. 2005. Sensory Bias as an Explanation for the Evolution of Mate Preferences. [Abstract]
  13. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Red_Queen:_Sex_and_the_Evolution_of_Human_Nature
  14. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513810000279
  15. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513810000279
  16. https://www.mnn.com/earth-matters/animals/stories/10-bizarre-beautiful-bird-courtship-dances
  17. https://www.nature.com/articles/srep02106/figures/3
  18. Matsuura K. 2014. A new pufferfish of the genus Torquigener that builds "mystery circles" on sandy bottoms in the Ryukyu Islands, Japan (Actinopterygii: Tetraodontiformes: Tetraodontidae). Ichthyological Research. Vol 62.2, pp. 207–212. [Abstract]
  19. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution_of_human_intelligence#Sexual_selection
  20. https://ontherapyaspse.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/geoffrey-miller-the-mating-mind.pdf
  21. https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#Looks_are_most_important_to_women_in_speed_dating
  22. https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#Looks_are_most_important_to_women_in_video_dating
  23. https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#Looks_are_most_important_to_women_in_blind_dating
  24. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/africa/article/gleaming-like-the-sun-aesthetic-values-in-wodaabe-material-culture/F01A60E10F8B46F927BD52D4B94E1139
  25. https://youtube.com/cqN_0dxqj7I?t=1997
  26. https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#Autists_are_judged_as_awkward.2C_less_physically_attractive_and_less_approachable_within_seconds
  27. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1936-02090-001
  28. https://incels.wiki/w/Scientific_Blackpill#Attractive_people_are_perceived_much_more_positively_than_they_really_are
  29. https://www.nber.org/papers/w12019
  30. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4415372/
  31. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4415372/ (Mitchem 2016)
  32. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4757567/ (Talamas 2016)
  33. https://www.the-scientist.com/features/a-fluctuating-reality-46903
  34. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rstb.2015.0380
  35. https://psyarxiv.com/2avu3/
  36. http://doi.org/10.1177/1474704918800063 (Lassek 2018)
  37. http://rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/4/1/160603
  38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.06.004 (Nedelec 2014)
  39. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.06.003 (Arnocky 2018)
  40. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.08.029 (O’Connor 2014)
  41. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513810000279
  42. http://larspenke.eu/pdfs/Kordsmeyer_et_al_2018_-_Intra-_vs_intersexual_selection_on_human_males.pdf
  43. https://www.amazon.com/Evolution-Beauty-Darwins-Forgotten-Theory/dp/0385537212

Loooks

Looks

Looks theoryLooksRegression toward the meanBeautyGolden RatioDecileFacial Aesthetics: Concepts and Clinical DiagnosisThe WallScientific BlackpillPhysiognomyBody dysmorphic disorderCheerleader effectGait

Lookism communities

Looksmax.meLookism.netLooksmax.net (defunct)

Looksmaxxing

GymmaxxingHeightmaxxingStatusmaxxingMoneymaxxingSurgerymaxxingWhitemaxxingAnabolic steroidsHGHSARMsJelqing

Looks levels

ChadChadliteBradGigachadTannerPretty BoyBeckyStacyMegastacyGigastacyWitch

Racepill

EthnicelJBW theoryRicecelCurrycelBlackcelArabcelWhitecel

Inceldom

AcnecelWristcelBaldcelEyecelNosecelOldcelUglycelFatcelShortcelSkinnycel

Body Parts

EyesLateral orbital rimLipsLower thirdMandibleMaxillaEyebrowMoustacheBoobsFeetBrowridgeCheeks

Body Characteristics

MacrophallismMidface ratioNeotenySexual attractivenessSexual dimorphism Facial Aesthetics: Concepts and Clinical DiagnosisFashionAntefaceFiveheadFrameFWHRCanthal tiltCompact midfaceDeep-set eyesHunter eyes

Redpill

Game

GameRomanceCourtshipNeggingSMVBeautyCharismaOrbiterBullyingLMSPUAAssholeTalk therapyIOIDominance hierarchyIODSocial circleSlayerN.L.POffline dating

Personality

NeurotypicalCoolCharismaStoicAssholeDark triadNice guyApproach anxietyConfidenceAsperger's SyndromeIQRationality

Pick Up Artists

Ross Jeffriesr/TRPReal Social DynamicsRooshVOwen CookPlayer SupremeWinston WuList of people in the seduction community

Sexuality

HypergamyCasual sexPump and dumpRapeSexual harassmentBodyguard hypothesisBetabuxReproductive successSexual envySex driveBateman's principleFemale passivitySexual conflictSlutPaternity assuranceFeminine imperativeNonredamancyAdverse effects of inceldomMaslow's hierarchy of needsHomosexualityHomocel hypothesisDemographics of inceldomPolygynyPolyandryMonogamyMate guardingIntrasexual competitionFisherian runawayCreepiness

Other theories

Timeless quotes on womenFemales are socially ineptWomen-are-wonderful effectGynocentrismMatthew effectApex fallacyClown worldFeminismSexual revolutionFemale subordinationFemale hypoagencyFemale solipsismFemme fataleBriffault's lawJuggernaut lawHalo effectVariability hypothesisAntifragilityTriggeredScientific BlackpillScientific Blackpill (Supplemental)Evolutionary mismatchMutationBehavioral sinkPolitical correctness‎Affirmative actionVirtue signalingEugenicsEnvironmentalismMale scarcity

Blackpill

Philosophy

Biological essentialismEugenicsAnti-EnvironmentalismTraditional conservatismFatalismBlackpillScientific BlackpillScientific Blackpill (Supplemental)Behavioral sinkHypergamyMatthew effectBeautyFisherian runawayDominance hierarchyIntrasexual competitionJ. D. UnwinSexual sublimationFemale subordinationOnline datingPhysiognomyPersonality

Marriage

SlutMonogamyMarriageArranged marriagePolygynyPolyandry

Anti-Lookism

LookismPuahate.com

Pills

BlackpillRacepillHeightpillDickpillBaldpillShitpillDogpillBirdpill

It's over

Cope or ropeCopeLay down and rotInbreeding depressionOutbreeding depressionMutationAtavismReproductive successDemographics of inceldomCauses of inceldomAdverse effects of inceldomEvolutionary mismatchBehavioral sink